Diffraction patterns and lasers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving a laser with a frequency of 6.33 × 10^14 Hz passing through a diffraction grating. The main question is to determine the width of the slit when the first minimum in the diffraction pattern coincides with the second-order position from a previous pattern. Calculations provided include using the wavelength of 633 nm and an angle of 39.3 degrees to find the distance between slits, resulting in values of 5 μm and 2 μm. There is confusion regarding whether the problem pertains to a single slit or a diffraction grating, as the equations used apply to both scenarios. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on the setup to proceed with the calculations effectively.
shyguy79
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A laser with monochromatic light of frequency 6.33 × 10^14 Hz is fired through a diffraction grating.

If the first minimum in this diffraction pattern coincides with the position of the second order that was seen in the previous diffraction pattern, what is the width of the slit?


Homework Equations


w=\frac{\gamma}{\sin\theta}

n\gamma=d\sin\theta_{n}

The Attempt at a Solution


Here are my results from a previous question to which it refers

Using the following values: \gamma=633nm
and \theta=39.3^{o}
and the equation n\gamma=dsin\theta_{n}

Rearranged for distance between the slits d=\frac{n\gamma}{sin\theta_{n}}
then d=\tfrac{5*633x10^{-9}m}{sin(39.3)}=5\mu m or 5.00E^{-6}m

Now to answer this question I've calculated the distance between the slits:

First calculate the distance between the slits second order using the equation d=\frac{n\gamma}{sin\theta} = \frac{2*633E^{-9}m}{sin(39.3)}=2\mu m or 2.0E{}^{-6}
m.

This is where I don't know where to go... I know I need w... but how? Please help, I've had a thought:
by combining the two equations and substituting for \sin\theta then maybe \frac{n\gamma}{d}=\frac{\gamma}{w} so w=\frac{\gamma d}{n\gamma}=\frac{d}{n}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

I'm getting confused in trying to follow what you did, so let's start by clearing some things up.

(I'll not worry that you're using \gamma for wavelength when λ is the conventional symbol used by maybe 99.9% of all physics teachers and textbooks :smile:)
shyguy79 said:

Homework Statement


A laser with monochromatic light of frequency 6.33 × 10^14 Hz is fired through a diffraction grating.

If the first minimum in this diffraction pattern coincides with the position of the second order that was seen in the previous diffraction pattern, what is the width of the slit?
Okay, for starters, diffraction gratings do not produce well-defined minima. Since you mention "the width of the slit", I am wondering if the current problem is actually for a single slit, whereas the previous problem did use a diffraction grating. Can you confirm this, or clarify what the setup really is for the two problems?

Homework Equations


w=\frac{\gamma}{\sin\theta}
That is either the 1st order minimum for a single slit of width w -- or possibly the 1st order maximum of a diffraction grating (or double slit) of grating (slit) spacing w.

n\gamma=d\sin\theta_{n}
Looks good. That gives the nth-order maxima of a diffraction grating (or double slit) of grating (slit) spacing d.

The Attempt at a Solution


Here are my results from a previous question to which it refers

Using the following values: \gamma=633nm
and \theta=39.3^{o}
and the equation n\gamma=dsin\theta_{n}

Rearranged for distance between the slits d=\frac{n\gamma}{sin\theta_{n}}
then d=\tfrac{5*633x10^{-9}m}{sin(39.3)}=5\mu m or 5.00E^{-6}m
It looks like the problem was to find d for a diffraction grating, if the 5th-order maximum makes an angle of 39.3° for light of wavelength 633 nm. Can you confirm my guess?
Now to answer this question I've calculated the distance between the slits:

First calculate the distance between the slits second order using the equation d=\frac{n\gamma}{sin\theta} = \frac{2*633E^{-9}m}{sin(39.3)}=2\mu m or 2.0E{}^{-6} m.
What slits? If it's the same diffraction grating, the grating spacing doesn't change and is still 5.00 μm. Or is it really supposed to be some other grating? :confused:

This is where I don't know where to go... I know I need w... but how? Please help, I've had a thought:
by combining the two equations and substituting for \sin\theta then maybe \frac{n\gamma}{d}=\frac{\gamma}{w} so w=\frac{\gamma d}{n\gamma}=\frac{d}{n}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top