Diffrentiating Piecewise Function

RPierre
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let L\in R and define

<br /> h(x) = \begin{cases} sin(1/x) &amp; \text{ if } x \neq 0 \\ L &amp; \text{ if } x = 0 \end{cases}<br />

Prove that h is not continuous at 0

Homework Equations



My Professor gave us the hint "Prove by contradiction, taking \epsilon = 1/2"


The Attempt at a Solution



I didn't see how this hint was relevant, but it seems too easy. All I did was say since a function is continuous at a point if it is differentiable at that point, then take 0. then h(x) = L and by first principles

lim h->0 f(x +h) - f(x) / h = L/0 which does not exist, and therefore the function is not continuous.

Why would he give that hint, and the piecewise function, when it could be proven so simply? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct that differentiability implies continuity, but the converse is false. Lack of differentiability does not imply lack of continuity, consider |x| which is continuous when x=0 dispite failing to be differentiable. For continuity consider the family of punctured disks (-n pi,n pi)\0 where n is a positive integer.
 
Last edited:
Note that sin(1/x)= 1 for x= 1/(2n\pi) for any integer n and that sin(1/x)= -1 for x= 1/((2n+1)\pi) for any integer n.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top