Diffusion of laser light for measuring laser power

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of building a DIY laser power meter with an accuracy target of around 10%. Participants explore the use of a phototransistor and the need for a suitable diffuser or integrating sphere to measure laser power effectively. The conversation touches on the theoretical and practical aspects of measuring optical power, including calibration issues and the properties required for diffusers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using a phototransistor with a linear response for measuring laser power, emphasizing the need for specific properties of a diffuser to calculate laser power accurately.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of a diffuser, proposing the use of an integrating sphere instead, which could be constructed inexpensively.
  • Concerns are raised about the calibration requirements for any DIY solution, particularly regarding the need for lasers of known power output to ensure accuracy.
  • Participants discuss the potential use of commercially available diffusers or integrating spheres, questioning the availability of specifications and pricing for such items.
  • There is a mention of previous discussions regarding the limitations of using a Lux meter for this purpose, indicating that it may not provide the necessary accuracy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to measuring laser power, with some advocating for the use of a diffuser and others suggesting an integrating sphere. There is no consensus on the best method or the feasibility of building a reliable DIY solution without calibration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the availability of known properties for diffusers and integrating spheres, as well as the challenges associated with calibration using lasers of unknown power. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the typical values for light absorption and scattering for various frequencies.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to hobbyists and researchers looking to measure laser power without investing in expensive commercial equipment, as well as those exploring DIY solutions in optical measurements.

jodyflorian
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've decided to make my own meter for measuring laser power to around 10% accuracy if possible. Optical power meters are way too expensive for me though.

One building block I've decided to use is a phototransistor, because I've found one which has very good linear response - when measuring mW/m^2. (Its datasheet has a graph showing collector current for the said power per area). The data sheet also has a response graph for various light frequencies which will be easy to use since lasers have a very specific color e.g. 532nm for green).

However, the hurdle I'm having trouble getting over is the diffuser. In principle, (please correct me if I'm wrong), if I know the following properties for a diffuser, it should be easy to calculate the laser power, given:

1) Distance of phototransistor from the diffuser
2) Placement position of phototransistor with respect to the diffuser
3) Light scattering pattern of the diffuser for various angles (inc. reflection)
4) absorption factor of the diffuser.
5) (values of 3 and 4 for the given laser frequency)

However, I'm having trouble finding anything I can use as a diffuser where 3, 4 and 5 are known. I don't have many, if any, tools to do this myself...
a) Multimeter
b) Oscilloscope
c) Lux meter
c) Three lasers of unknown power (in the 1 to 20 milliwatt range, I expect)

Please could anyone suggest a way of going about this, perhaps...
i) Buying cheap LEDs of known frequency and output power for calibrating
ii) Buying a diffuser with the above known properties (3, 4, 5)

Thanks :)
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'm confused- why do you want to use a diffuser? There are good reasons (polarization, stability, etc), but when measuring optical power, the diffuser is something called an 'integrating sphere'. Perhaps you could construct an inexpensive one that meets your needs- I bet spraying the inside of a ball with that popcorn paint stuff (seen on 1970's era ceilings) would work fine.
 
Lol @ popcorn paint. Brilliant - now I know the term! "Integrating Sphere".

I'm just trying to find the cheapest way of measuring laser output so I can judge lasers that I buy off ebay, and optical power meters seem to go for no less than £150 so about $250.

The main hurdle I'm coming up against is that anything I build myself seems to need calibration with lasers of known power output - which I dont' have!

I was thinking that if I bought a diffuser with known properties, and use a phototransistor with known properties, I wouldn't need to calibrate it.

The only alternative apparently involves measuring the cross sectional area of the beam, which my gut feel says would be really quite inaccurate and a fair amount of work for each laser that I test... (This would use the Lux meter and I'm not comfortable with the calculations involved!)

I really like the idea of using an Integrating Sphere, but I assume if I build my own it would still need calibration! I've just done a search on google and found a few suppliers but no prices and no specs... should I just look harder, or am I facing a brick wall here? I'd need to know the proportion of light falling on the sphere's surface vs the amount being absorbed, for given frequencies, I assume? Is this a typical value that should really be readily available from the manufacturers or am I missing the point? Just a thought as well... I have a horrible feeling that a ready made integrating sphere could cost more than £150!? DOH!

Thanks!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K