Understanding Diffusion: The Relationship Between RMS and Fick's 2nd Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lindsayyyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffusion Law Rms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the root mean square (RMS) displacement in diffusion and Fick's second law. The RMS formula, <x^2> = 2·D·T, describes how the mean square distance traveled by particles is proportional to time, without considering concentration. In contrast, Fick's second law emphasizes that diffusion rates increase with higher concentration gradients. The query seeks clarification on how these two concepts interrelate, particularly regarding the apparent lack of concentration dependency in the RMS formula. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the dynamics of diffusion processes.
Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have a question concerning the following:

There is a relationship for diffusion concerning the RMS:

&lt;x^2&gt;= 2\cdot D \cdot T for one dimension and there is also Fick's 2nd Law.

When does the above formula apply?

What I don't understand is that in the RMS formula there is no dependancy on concentration. But if I understood it correctly from Fick's 2nd law the higher the concentration gradient, the higher my change of concentration, which would mean the diffusion process takes place faster.

Can anyone help me?

Thanks in advance

Best regards Lindsayyyy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Need some context. Where does your equation arise?

I'm guessing that your ##<x^2>## means something like ## < x^2 \phi(x)> / <\phi(x)>## so that the concentration divides out. Basically what it is telling you is, a concentrated spot of material will spread out such that the mean square distance it has traveled is proportional to time.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top