Dimension Analysis Homework: Buckingham Theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Buckingham theorem in dimension analysis, specifically regarding the differences between two equations involving the sine function and the angle phi. It is clarified that while sin(phi) and phi have the same dimension for small angles, the distinction becomes significant for larger angles, affecting the correctness of the equations. The participants agree that the primary difference lies in the substitution of phi with sin(phi), with no essential difference in their dimensionless forms. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding small-angle approximations in the context of pendulum motion. Ultimately, the problem is recognized as straightforward once the dimensionless variables are established.
dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/613/70858934fn5.png

Homework Equations


Buckingham theorem

The Attempt at a Solution


My question is what is the difference between question a and b? The sine doesn't influence the dimension. Or is it a question to trick me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What I meant is that sin(phi) has the same dimension as phi so the answers of a and b are the same, right?
 
sin(phi) is only equivelent to phi (approximately) for very small phi, i.e. very small oscillations of the pendulum, when simple harmonic motion occurs.
Above very small angles, formula (a) is correct, (b) incorrect, as the variation between phi and sin(phi) becomes significant.
Look at Small-angle Approximation on the following link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum_(mathematics )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It says in the problem statement that phi is small for part b. The question is about expressing the equations in dimensionless variables.

dirk_mec1 said:
My question is what is the difference between question a and b? The sine doesn't influence the dimension. Or is it a question to trick me?

I think the question really is as easy as it seems: no essential difference between the two equations, other than replacing φ with sin(φ). Once you've converted one equation to a dimensionless form, you basically have the other.
 
Thanks for the confirmation redbelly.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top