Dimension of Fields in Physics: What is it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfy4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Fields
jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I was not entirely sure where to post this, but I think this will work.

With the gravitational field we have that
g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\alpha\beta}=4
which is the dimension of the manifold I believe. I have normally heard of g_{\alpha\beta} being interpreted as the gravitational field quantity (or the tetrad). For the other fields in physics (like A_{\mu}), how does one compute the dimension, or does such a quantity not exist for anything other than the gravitational field?

Thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dimension is a property of the underlying manifold (ie. how many coordinates do you need to specify a point). All fields inherit their dimensionality from the manifold. In string theory, apparently you can get emergent space - where energy becomes a dimension - but I have no understanding of this!
 
jfy4 said:
Hi,

I was not entirely sure where to post this, but I think this will work.

With the gravitational field we have that
g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\alpha\beta}=4
which is the dimension of the manifold I believe. I have normally heard of g_{\alpha\beta} being interpreted as the gravitational field quantity (or the tetrad). For the other fields in physics (like A_{\mu}), how does one compute the dimension, or does such a quantity not exist for anything other than the gravitational field?

Thanks in advance,

The contraction of the metric with its inverse indeed gives the dimension of the spacetime you are looking at. You can see this by taking a look at how the metric tensor is contracted twice with some vectorial quantity A_{\nu} in a d-dimensional space:

g_{\mu\rho}g^{\mu\nu}A_{\nu}=A_{\rho}.

Therefore we can make the identification with a Kronecker delta of dimension d:

g_{\mu\rho}g^{\mu\nu}={\delta_{\rho}}^{\nu}.

The trace of the Kronecker delta gives just the dimension of the space, therefore

g_{\mu\nu}g^{\mu\nu}=d.
 
Last edited:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top