Dimension of interaction in a QFT theory

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the mass dimensions of interactions in quantum field theory (QFT) and how these dimensions relate to the classical beta function for the associated coupling. The original poster seeks clarification on the meaning of interaction dimensions and their implications for calculating the beta function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of power-counting dimensions for operators in QFT, discussing how the dimensions of fields are determined from kinetic terms. Questions arise regarding the computation of the beta function and its dependence on the interaction dimension compared to the spacetime dimension.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the scaling behavior of fields and the transformation of interactions under rescaling. The original poster expresses appreciation for the help received, indicating a productive exchange of ideas. However, there is no explicit consensus on the final approach to the beta function.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions the need to discuss the implications of interactions where the dimension Δ is greater than or less than the spacetime dimension d, which remains a point of exploration in the discussion.

nikosbak
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The problem statement.

When an exercises say " the interaction in a QFT has dimensions Δ" , what does it mean?, it means the field or the Lagrangian has this mass dimension?

In this exercise I'm trying to find the classical beta function (β-function) for the assciated couling.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like they mean the power-counting dimension of the operator corresponding to the interaction in question, where the dimension of the field is determined from the kinetic term. So, in 4d for a scalar ##\phi##, the dimension of ##\phi^4## would be 4, while the dimension of ##\phi^2 (\partial \phi)^2## would be 6, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nikosbak
Oh I see , I think i got it , but still I don't see how to compute the beta function to get to the form
$$\beta(g)=(d-\Delta)g+\mathcal{O}(g^2)$$
I really appreciate the help :)

The full exercise is :

Show that if the interaction in a QFT is has dimension Δ then there is a classical β function for the associated coupling given by ,
$$\beta(g)=(d-\Delta)g+\mathcal{O}(g^2)$$
Discuss what happens to interactions where Δ > d or Δ < d.

Any hits or insight will do , thank you very much :D
 
nikosbak said:
Oh I see , I think i got it , but still I don't see how to compute the beta function to get to the form
$$\beta(g)=(d-\Delta)g+\mathcal{O}(g^2)$$
I really appreciate the help :)

The full exercise is :

Show that if the interaction in a QFT is has dimension Δ then there is a classical β function for the associated coupling given by ,
$$\beta(g)=(d-\Delta)g+\mathcal{O}(g^2)$$
Discuss what happens to interactions where Δ > d or Δ < d.

Any hits or insight will do , thank you very much :D

I'll outline this, because once the concepts are put together, there really isn't a lot of work left for you to do.I will consider the case of a single field, but you should generalize the argument for multiple fields + allow for derivatives in the coupling.

Consider an interaction of the form

$$S_\text{int} = \int d^dx g_0 \Phi^r$$

and do the rescaling ##x\rightarrow \lambda x##. Under this transformation, the fields transform according to their scaling dimension, ##\delta##, namely ##\Phi\rightarrow \lambda^{-\delta}\Phi##. In fact, we will find that

$$S_\text{int} \rightarrow \int d^dx g_0 \lambda^\kappa \Phi^r,$$

for some exponent ##\kappa## that you should relate to ##d## and ##\Delta##. The theory is obviously only invariant under the scale transformation if the exponent ##\kappa## is zero for all of the terms in the action, but we can still define an effective coupling ##g(\lambda) = g_0 \lambda^\kappa##. The corresponding beta function, defined as

$$\beta_g(\lambda) = \lambda \frac{dg(\lambda)}{d\lambda},$$

can then be computed.
 
Ahaa I solved it . It was a lot easier that I thought !

thank for your time :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
832
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
925
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K