Dimension of interaction in a QFT theory

nikosbak
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The problem statement.

When an exercises say " the interaction in a QFT has dimensions Δ" , what does it mean?, it means the field or the Lagrangian has this mass dimension?

In this exercise I'm trying to find the classical beta function (β-function) for the assciated couling.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like they mean the power-counting dimension of the operator corresponding to the interaction in question, where the dimension of the field is determined from the kinetic term. So, in 4d for a scalar ##\phi##, the dimension of ##\phi^4## would be 4, while the dimension of ##\phi^2 (\partial \phi)^2## would be 6, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes nikosbak
Oh I see , I think i got it , but still I don't see how to compute the beta function to get to the form
$$\beta(g)=(d-\Delta)g+\mathcal{O}(g^2)$$
I really appreciate the help :)

The full exercise is :

Show that if the interaction in a QFT is has dimension Δ then there is a classical β function for the associated coupling given by ,
$$\beta(g)=(d-\Delta)g+\mathcal{O}(g^2)$$
Discuss what happens to interactions where Δ > d or Δ < d.

Any hits or insight will do , thank you very much :D
 
nikosbak said:
Oh I see , I think i got it , but still I don't see how to compute the beta function to get to the form
$$\beta(g)=(d-\Delta)g+\mathcal{O}(g^2)$$
I really appreciate the help :)

The full exercise is :

Show that if the interaction in a QFT is has dimension Δ then there is a classical β function for the associated coupling given by ,
$$\beta(g)=(d-\Delta)g+\mathcal{O}(g^2)$$
Discuss what happens to interactions where Δ > d or Δ < d.

Any hits or insight will do , thank you very much :D

I'll outline this, because once the concepts are put together, there really isn't a lot of work left for you to do.I will consider the case of a single field, but you should generalize the argument for multiple fields + allow for derivatives in the coupling.

Consider an interaction of the form

$$S_\text{int} = \int d^dx g_0 \Phi^r$$

and do the rescaling ##x\rightarrow \lambda x##. Under this transformation, the fields transform according to their scaling dimension, ##\delta##, namely ##\Phi\rightarrow \lambda^{-\delta}\Phi##. In fact, we will find that

$$S_\text{int} \rightarrow \int d^dx g_0 \lambda^\kappa \Phi^r,$$

for some exponent ##\kappa## that you should relate to ##d## and ##\Delta##. The theory is obviously only invariant under the scale transformation if the exponent ##\kappa## is zero for all of the terms in the action, but we can still define an effective coupling ##g(\lambda) = g_0 \lambda^\kappa##. The corresponding beta function, defined as

$$\beta_g(\lambda) = \lambda \frac{dg(\lambda)}{d\lambda},$$

can then be computed.
 
Ahaa I solved it . It was a lot easier that I thought !

thank for your time :)
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top