Dimension Question: How Does Math Shrink 3-D Shapes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wizardsblade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension
Wizardsblade
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
I remember when I was in school my professor mathematically shrank a cube to a point and when he did so it was a sphere. So I was wondering does this mean that a sphere is the best way to think 3-D. Then I also wondered what would a square shrink to, I would guess a circle but I do not remember how he did this. Then I thought about a line... would it turn out to be a vector or would it stay a line? Anyhow I would be grateful if someone knew these answers of knows how the math was done to show this.
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Wizardsblade said:
I remember when I was in school my professor mathematically shrank a cube to a point and when he did so it was a sphere. ... Anyhow I would be grateful if someone knew these answers of knows how the math was done to show this.

A point is a zero-dimensional object. It is not a line segment, a circle, or a sphere, or any other dimensioned object. It is mathematically invalid to speak of a point as being a sphere since a sphere has a non-zero radius by definition. For that matter, it is mathematically invalid to speak of a point as being any dimensioned object. Your professor was playing games with degeneracies.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top