Dimensionalysis and Conversions

  • Thread starter Thread starter honphysics12
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the dimensional consistency of various formulas using unit conversions. Participants analyze equations involving energy, speed, area, and their relationships to mass, acceleration, and length. The calculations confirm that energy can be expressed as mass multiplied by acceleration and length, resulting in the unit Kg m²/s², which aligns with the standard unit for energy. The conversation emphasizes treating units like numbers during multiplication and squaring dimensions appropriately. Overall, the thread clarifies the process of verifying dimensional consistency in physics equations.
honphysics12
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use the units given in the table below to determine whether the formulas are dimensionally consistent.

/ this symbol (to the left) means divided by

Length= distance= m

mass= Kg

time= s

area= m squared

speed= m/s

acceleration= m/s squared (only the s is squared)

force= Kg m/s squared (only the s is squared)

energy= Kg m squared /s squared

power= Kg m squared /s cubed

Homework Equations



How do you solve these and how do you multiply the units?

Does energy= (mass) (acceleration) (length)

Does speed= acceleration/time

Does area= (length) (length)

Does energy= (mass) (speed squared)

Does energy= (mass) (acceleration)/length

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried the first one.

energy= (mass) (acceleration) (length)
= [Kg] [m/s squared] [m]
= [Kg m squared /s]

Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
honphysics12 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried the first one.

energy= (mass) (acceleration) (length)
= [Kg] [m/s squared] [m]
= [Kg m squared /s]

Is that right?

Does that answer match with the unit for energy, which you wrote earlier?

Treat the units as you would ordinary numbers.
 
So when I multiply the 2 m's and the 2 s's, they become squared right?

The answer would then be Kg m squared /s squared.
 
Correct.
 
honphysics12 said:
So when I multiply the 2 m's and the 2 s's, they become squared right?

Right! That's really all there is to it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top