Diminishing Gravitational Acceleration with Distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the equation for gravitational acceleration diminishing with distance from a mass, specifically g = GM/(R + h)^2, where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the object, R is its radius, and h is the height above the surface. The gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between two objects, following the 1/r^2 relationship. This means that doubling the distance reduces the gravitational force by a factor of four. To relate gravitational force to acceleration, Newton's second law (F=ma) is applied, leading to a similar reduction in acceleration with increased distance. The conversation also touches on the conditions under which these equations are valid, emphasizing the need for spherical symmetry or a significant size disparity between the objects involved.
cbd1
Messages
123
Reaction score
1
I'm wondering what the equation is that shows how a gravitational field diminishes with distance from the object of mass. I would be looking for an equation showing the difference in the value of gravitational acceleration at points in space with increasing distance from the body. Would this be shown with a differential equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
g = \frac{GM}{(R + h)^2}

Where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the gravitating body (the Earth for example), R is the radius of the body (radius of the Earth for example), and h is the height above the surface of the body.
 
GMm
----- or (GMm)/r^2
r^2

is the formula for the gravitational force. G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of one object, m is the mass of the other object and r is the distance between the two. r is measured from the center of mass of the both objects so my r equals Superstrings (R+h), and it only works if both objects are pretty much spherical or one of the objects is really small in relation to the other, as an example you and the earth, it can be assumed that you are a point mass in respect Earth. If these conditions are not there, you need to use integration.

A short answer to what you are asking would be, the gravitational force is inversely related to the square of the distance between the two objects. It is the magical 1/r^2 relation which also shows up in Coulomb's law in electrostatics. As an example if you doubled the distance between 2 objects, you would lessen the gravitational force by 4 folds. Edit: I have re-read your topic and if you need to also talk about acceleration then you need to get Newton involved with the F=ma. F would be GMm/r^2, m's will cancel on both sides and acceleration will equal to what superstring wrote on his post. Therefore the acceleration would also be cut down by 4 times.

Ps: Superstring how do u post your equations like that? I'd like to learn.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top