Diminishing Gravitational Acceleration with Distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the equation for gravitational acceleration diminishing with distance from a mass, specifically g = GM/(R + h)^2, where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the object, R is its radius, and h is the height above the surface. The gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between two objects, following the 1/r^2 relationship. This means that doubling the distance reduces the gravitational force by a factor of four. To relate gravitational force to acceleration, Newton's second law (F=ma) is applied, leading to a similar reduction in acceleration with increased distance. The conversation also touches on the conditions under which these equations are valid, emphasizing the need for spherical symmetry or a significant size disparity between the objects involved.
cbd1
Messages
123
Reaction score
1
I'm wondering what the equation is that shows how a gravitational field diminishes with distance from the object of mass. I would be looking for an equation showing the difference in the value of gravitational acceleration at points in space with increasing distance from the body. Would this be shown with a differential equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
g = \frac{GM}{(R + h)^2}

Where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the gravitating body (the Earth for example), R is the radius of the body (radius of the Earth for example), and h is the height above the surface of the body.
 
GMm
----- or (GMm)/r^2
r^2

is the formula for the gravitational force. G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of one object, m is the mass of the other object and r is the distance between the two. r is measured from the center of mass of the both objects so my r equals Superstrings (R+h), and it only works if both objects are pretty much spherical or one of the objects is really small in relation to the other, as an example you and the earth, it can be assumed that you are a point mass in respect Earth. If these conditions are not there, you need to use integration.

A short answer to what you are asking would be, the gravitational force is inversely related to the square of the distance between the two objects. It is the magical 1/r^2 relation which also shows up in Coulomb's law in electrostatics. As an example if you doubled the distance between 2 objects, you would lessen the gravitational force by 4 folds. Edit: I have re-read your topic and if you need to also talk about acceleration then you need to get Newton involved with the F=ma. F would be GMm/r^2, m's will cancel on both sides and acceleration will equal to what superstring wrote on his post. Therefore the acceleration would also be cut down by 4 times.

Ps: Superstring how do u post your equations like that? I'd like to learn.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top