I Understanding the Dirac Commutation Relations in QFT

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am reading Peskin's book on QFT and at a point he wants to show that the Dirac field can't be quantified using this commutation relations: ##[\psi_a(x),\psi_b^\dagger(x)]=\delta^3(x-y)\delta_{ab}## (where ##\psi## is the solution to Dirac equation). I am not sure I understand the math behind the commutation relation (I understand why physically it is wrong) as you have a column and a raw vector, so doing the commutation you have the difference between a number and a 4x4 matrix and I am not sure how does this work. Can someone explain it to me? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to solve your misconception about "physically wrong", what you have on the left-hand-side is again a 4x4 matrix (has indices a,b running from 1 to 4), and similarily for the right-hand-side.
 
The in
ChrisVer said:
Just to solve your misconception about "physically wrong", what you have on the left-hand-side is again a 4x4 matrix (has indices a,b running from 1 to 4), and similarily for the right-hand-side.
The indeces a and b are fixed, they don't run from 1 to 4. They just specify the spin state.
 
Silviu said:
The indeces a and b are fixed, they don't run from 1 to 4. They just specify the spin state.
what do you mean by fixed? the equation has 16 fixed numbers in the left-hand-side (like a 4x4 matrix) and 16 fixed numbers in the right hand side (again like a 4x4 matrix).
The indices indicate one of the Dirac 4-spinor components:
\psi = \begin{pmatrix} \psi_1 \\ \psi_2 \\ \psi_3 \\ \psi_4 \end{pmatrix}
Why would you have vectors then for \psi_a ?
 
Back
Top