Previously I posted a question on the Dirac delta function and was informed it was not a true function, but rather a distribution. However, I have to admit I still did not understand why its integral (neg inf to pos inf) is unity. I've thought about this and came up with the following:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Consider a normal distribution with a variance of 0. Since the integral of a normal distribution is constrained to be unity, the mean must go to infinity as the variance approaches zero. This is the Dirac delta. Is this reasonable or am I wandering in the wilderness?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dirac delta distribution

Loading...

Similar Threads - Dirac delta distribution | Date |
---|---|

I Lebesgue Integral of Dirac Delta "function" | Nov 17, 2017 |

Dirac-delta function in spherical polar coordinates | Oct 7, 2017 |

Limit involving dirac delta distributions | Feb 26, 2012 |

Product of dirac delta distributions | Dec 7, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**