Dirac Gamma Matrices: Is Invariance Under Lorentz Transformation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the invariance of the Dirac gamma matrix γ^5 under Lorentz transformations. While the four gamma matrices γ^i are confirmed to be invariant, the expression for γ^5 as a product of these matrices raises questions about its invariance. Specifically, the alternative representation of γ^5 involves the Levi-Civita symbol εμνρσ, which suggests it behaves like a pseudo-scalar. This leads to a contradiction regarding its invariance under Lorentz transformations. The core issue remains whether γ^5 can be considered invariant despite its pseudo-scalar characteristics.
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi!
I can define
\gamma^5=i\gamma^0\gamma^1\gamma^2\gamma^3
I know that the four gamma matrices \gamma^i\:\:,\;i=0...3 are invariant under a Lorentz transformation. So I can say that also \gamma ^5 is invariant, because it is a product of invariant matrices.
But this equality holds:
\gamma ^5=\frac{i}{4!}\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\rho}\gamma^{\sigma}
and this expression is not invariant!
So, is \gamma^5 invariant or isn't it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\gamma^\mu transforms like a 4-vector.
 
But \gamma^5 transforms like a pseudo-scalar because of \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top