Dirac Hydrogen Atom: Parity and Odd-Operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of odd operators in the context of the Dirac version of Schrödinger's equation for the hydrogen atom. It establishes that for states | j j_z l > with definite parity, the diagonal elements of the odd operator \(\vec{S} \cdot \hat{r}\) are zero. This conclusion arises from the relationship between odd operators and parity operators, specifically that \(\pi^\dagger A \pi = -A\), leading to the requirement that \(\langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle = 0\) for states with definite parity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and the Dirac equation
  • Familiarity with parity operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of odd and even operators in quantum mechanics
  • Proficiency in using Pauli matrices and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of parity in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the mathematical framework of odd operators in quantum systems
  • Learn about the Dirac equation and its applications to atomic systems
  • Investigate the role of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the properties of quantum operators and their applications in atomic physics.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Hey I was reading through a text and came across:
"[ Having extracted the Dirac version of Schrödinger's equation of the H atom...] Since the states | j j_z l > have definite parity, the odd-operator \vec{S} \cdot \hat{r} will have vanishing diagonal elements. Also since \big(\vec{S} \cdot \hat{r} \big)^2 =1 then its offdiagonal elements will be \frac{1}{2} e^{\pm i \phi} (we can choose the phase \phi=0)[...]"

I can understand the second statement from the Pauli matrices... However I think that I don't understand the 1st statement as it is... why would the diagonal elements of an odd-operator be zero if parity is definite?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what they mean as "fixed" is actually "definite".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChrisVer
Yup understand that... (a flaw in my translation :biggrin:)...I don't understand why the diagonal elements are zero.
 
If ##A## is an odd operator and ##\pi## is a parity operator, then we have ##\pi^\dagger A \pi = -A##. If furthermore a state ##|\psi\rangle## which has a definite parity sandwhiches the expression ##\pi^\dagger A \pi = -A## from left and right in each side of the equation, you will get ##\langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle = -\langle \psi|A|\psi \rangle## because ##\langle \psi|\pi^\dagger A \pi|\psi \rangle = \langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle##. You see then we must require ##\langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle = 0## so that the previous relation can hold.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory, vanhees71, JorisL and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K