Dirac Hydrogen Atom: Parity and Odd-Operator

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Hey I was reading through a text and came across:
"[ Having extracted the Dirac version of Schrödinger's equation of the H atom...] Since the states [itex]| j j_z l >[/itex] have definite parity, the odd-operator [itex]\vec{S} \cdot \hat{r}[/itex] will have vanishing diagonal elements. Also since [itex]\big(\vec{S} \cdot \hat{r} \big)^2 =1[/itex] then its offdiagonal elements will be [itex]\frac{1}{2} e^{\pm i \phi}[/itex] (we can choose the phase [itex]\phi=0[/itex])[...]"

I can understand the second statement from the Pauli matrices... However I think that I don't understand the 1st statement as it is... why would the diagonal elements of an odd-operator be zero if parity is definite?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what they mean as "fixed" is actually "definite".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChrisVer
Yup understand that... (a flaw in my translation :biggrin:)...I don't understand why the diagonal elements are zero.
 
If ##A## is an odd operator and ##\pi## is a parity operator, then we have ##\pi^\dagger A \pi = -A##. If furthermore a state ##|\psi\rangle## which has a definite parity sandwhiches the expression ##\pi^\dagger A \pi = -A## from left and right in each side of the equation, you will get ##\langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle = -\langle \psi|A|\psi \rangle## because ##\langle \psi|\pi^\dagger A \pi|\psi \rangle = \langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle##. You see then we must require ##\langle \psi| A |\psi \rangle = 0## so that the previous relation can hold.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory, vanhees71, JorisL and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K