Direction of static friction for an object on a car that is in circular motion

AI Thread Summary
Static friction acts in the same direction as the centripetal force for an object on a truck in circular motion because it prevents slipping between surfaces. While friction typically resists motion, it can also provide the necessary inward force to keep an object moving in a circle. Without friction, the object would slide outward due to inertia. Friction resists relative motion, allowing it to exert an inward force that accelerates the object toward the center of the circular path. Understanding this dual role of friction clarifies its importance in circular motion dynamics.
miri144
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain why static friction points in the same direction as the centripetal force for an object (like a box) on the flatbed of the truck that is traveling in uniform circular motion?

Thanks in advance. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the friction is what's applying the force to accelerate the object. So if the object is centripetally accelerating, then the friction is applying a centripetal force.
 
But I thought friction was supposed to resist motion, not accelerate objects.
 
miri144 said:
But I thought friction was supposed to resist motion, not accelerate objects.
Why can't it do both? Friction resists slipping between surfaces. If there were no friction, the object would tend to slide outward. Friction prevents that slipping and in the process exerts an inward accelerating force which keeps the object moving in a circle.
 
miri144 said:
But I thought friction was supposed to resist motion.
To reword Doc Al's post, friction resists relative motion between surfaces in contact with each other. The surfaces may be accelerating or experiencing an external force (such as gravity on an inclined surface), but if there is sufficient friction, there won't be any relative motion between the surfaces.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top