Discover the Chemical Formula for Coal Liquification | Complete Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hevonen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coal
AI Thread Summary
Coal liquefaction does not have a specific chemical formula, as it involves complex processes rather than a single reaction. The process utilizes hydrocarbon species in coal, which, when treated with hydrogen, can yield liquid products. Coking coal is particularly significant as it generates tars that can be hydrogenated and cracked into liquids. Additionally, coal can be converted into syngas, which can then be transformed into liquid fuels through the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Overall, coal liquefaction is a multifaceted process rather than a straightforward chemical equation.
Hevonen
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Coal liquification

What is the chemical formula for coal liquification?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't one.

Coal contains some hydrocarbon species that, when treated with hydrogen, produce a liquid.
Coking coal produces tars that can be hydrogenated and cracked to produce a liquid.
Coal can be converted to syngas and that syngas used in a Fischer-Tropsch process to produce liquid fuels.
 
chemisttree said:
There isn't one.

Coal contains some hydrocarbon species that, when treated with hydrogen, produce a liquid.
Coking coal produces tars that can be hydrogenated and cracked to produce a liquid.
Coal can be converted to syngas and that syngas used in a Fischer-Tropsch process to produce liquid fuels.

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top