Discover the Heat Transfer in a Thermo-Aluminum Calorimeter with Metallic Blocks

  • Thread starter Thread starter PrudensOptimus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermo
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the specific heat capacity of an unknown metallic block using a thermal equilibrium scenario involving an aluminum calorimeter, water, and two metallic blocks. The system reaches a final temperature of 15.0°C after introducing a 40.0 g copper block at 80.0°C and a 13.0 g unknown block at 116.0°C. The heat transfer equation is applied, leading to the calculation of the unknown block's specific heat capacity as -11.65 J/g°C. This negative value indicates that the unknown block absorbs heat more readily than the other materials, suggesting it may be a metal with a lower atomic mass, like silver or gold. Further experiments are necessary to validate this conclusion.
PrudensOptimus
Messages
641
Reaction score
0
An aluminum calorimeter of mass 100 g contains 250 g of water. The calorimeter and water are in thermal equilibrium at 12.0°C. Two metallic blocks are placed into the water. One is a 40.0 g piece of copper at 80.0°C; the other block has a mass of 13.0 g and is originally at a temperature of 116.0°C. The entire system stabilizes at a final temperature of 15.0°C.



Here's what I have so far:

(mcΔT)A + (mcΔT)W = (mcΔT)Cu + (mcΔT)Unknown
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Where:
m = mass
c = specific heat capacity
ΔT = change in temperature
A = aluminum calorimeter
W = water
Cu = copper block
Unknown = unknown metallic block

To solve for the specific heat capacity of the unknown metallic block, we can rearrange the equation to:

cUnknown = [(mcΔT)A + (mcΔT)W - (mcΔT)Cu] / (mΔT)Unknown

Plugging in the given values, we get:

cUnknown = [(100g)(0°C - 15°C) + (250g)(0°C - 15°C) - (40.0g)(80.0°C - 15.0°C)] / (13.0g)(116.0°C - 15.0°C)

cUnknown = -15000 J / (13.0g)(101.0°C)

cUnknown = -11.65 J/g°C

This negative value suggests that the unknown metallic block has a lower specific heat capacity than the other materials in the system, meaning it can absorb heat more easily. This could indicate that the unknown block is made of a metal with a lower atomic mass, such as silver or gold. Further experiments and calculations would be needed to confirm this hypothesis.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top