Discovering a Unique PCM: High Volume Change, Low Heat Storage Capacity

  • Thread starter Thread starter eknifff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pcm Phase change
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the search for a unique Phase Change Material (PCM) characterized by high volume change and low heat storage capacity, contrasting with the industry's typical focus on energy storage. The original poster expresses difficulty in finding relevant information due to the prevailing industrial bias. Concerns are raised about the lack of specifications from commercial providers regarding acceptable pressures, suggesting that pressure impacts the performance of PCMs significantly. The conversation includes suggestions for identifying suitable PCMs, such as consulting melting point tables for organic chemicals. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges in sourcing PCMs that meet specific criteria outside conventional applications.
eknifff
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find a Phase Change Material (PCM), but the entire industry is pretty one-minded when it comes to what it should be used for - energy storage. You can see by the wording of the Wikipedia article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-change_material
that they list advantages like "High volumetric latent heat storage capacity" and disadvantages like "Change of volume is very high"
However, for my project, I'm actually trying to find the opposite! I'm looking for a PCM with large volume change but low heat storage capacity. Finding it really hard to google this as the industrial bias means everyone is looking the other direction, so I'm putting this out here. Anyone knows of any PCM, or broadly any PCM type, that fits this description?
Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's hard to have a big change of volume without doing work (storing heat).
 
  • Like
Likes eknifff
Thanks Dr. Courtney! That makes good sense.

Speaking of this energy imbalance, I noticed that commercial providers rarely provide specifications on acceptable pressures, usually only giving operational limits in terms of temperature. Does this mean that it is fine for all reasonable pressures? That doesn't really make sense, because the expanding PCM might end up doing a lot of work if the external pressure is large, while the amount of heat energy input seems to be approximately a constant.
 
It would e hard to hold providers to their specs at pressures that were not close to atmospheric pressures.
 
So physically, what's happening when I put in enough energy to melt the PCM, but I constrain the material with a large pressure such that its expansion would result in more work done than the heat energy I put in?
 
What temperature transition are you looking for ?
Do you need a solid–liquid or liquid–gas phase transition ?

The traditional thermostat fitted to ICEs contains a blend of paraffin wax. That is selected because it has a large volumetric change over a narrow temperature range.

If you know the temperature of the transition then look at a table of melting points for organic chemicals. The CRC handbook has such tables, sorted in temperature order.

I once used that technique to find a chemical for a specific temperature sensor and found that Lewisite had the optimum properties. Unfortunately it is highly toxic, so check your selection carefully.
 
Hello! I've been brainstorming on how to prevent a lot of ferrofluid droplets that are in the same container. This is for an art idea that I have (I absolutely love it when science and art come together) where I want it to look like a murmuration of starlings. Here's a link of what they look like: How could I make this happen? The only way I can think of to achieve the desired effect is to have varying droplet sizes of ferrofluid suspended in a clear viscous liquid. Im hoping for the...
Hello everyone! I am curious to learn how laboratories handle in-house chip manufacturing using soft lithography for microfluidics research. In the lab where I worked, only the mask for lithography was made by an external company, whereas the mold and chip fabrication were carried out by us. The process of making PDMS chips required around 30 min–1 h of manual work between prepolymer casting, punching/cutting, and plasma bonding. However, the total time required to make them was around 4...
Back
Top