Discrepancy in my calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter lilrex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user's frustration with thermodynamics calculations, specifically related to a diesel cycle's thermal efficiency. They present a series of equations and variables, including pressure, temperature, and volume ratio, but express uncertainty about their calculations leading to a significant discrepancy in energy output. The response highlights the need for a clear problem statement and detailed calculations to identify errors in the user's approach. Without this clarity, it's challenging to pinpoint the source of the discrepancy. The user seeks guidance to improve their understanding and accuracy in thermodynamic calculations.
lilrex
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I am having a problem with some thermodynamics calculations. I am not very experienced with them and it certainly shows in my frustration with them! Anyway the check that I am using is incrementally simulated work compared to theoretical energy in.

Example 31KJ in 133KJ mechanical work out. I am obviously way off considering other calculations predicted 42% thermal eff. if you ignore over unity. (diesel cycle)

I am having trouble formulating intelligent questions that might help me understand what I am doing wrong but here it goes:

let:

p = pressure, y = 1.4,Cr = compressed volume ratio, Ps = initial pressure, Ta = temp added = 1000,
Ti = initial temperature = 300K
Vr = volume ratio

Vr = Cr
if Cr = 1, then T = Ti * Cr^(y-1) = 300K, T = T + Ta, Cr = (T/Ti)^(1/(y-1)) = 39.089

if the volume did not increase, p = 14.7 * cr^(1.4) = 2490 psi

is this not correct? or am I missing something?

now if Vr = .5 then Cr = Cr/Vr = 78

1714K = Ti * Cr^(y-1)
and
6550 PSI = 14.7 * Cr^(1.4)
How does this second part look?

Thank you for your help, I appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You did not state the problem as given to you. Instead, you present your erroneous calculations and ask us to figure out where you went wrong. Without a clear statement of the problem and your work showing how you got 31 kJ in and 133 kJ mechanical work out, we cannot figure out where you went wrong.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top