Discuss a system of equations by Gauss

inverse
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello,

How would you discuss this system of equations by Gauss's method?

\begin{bmatrix}{x}&{y}&{(m-1)z}&{1}\\{x}&{(m-1)y}&{z}&{m-1}\\{(m-1)x}&{y}&{z}&{m+2}\end{bmatrix}

NOTE: the last column are the independent terms

Thank you very much
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
inverse said:
Hello,

How would you discuss this system of equations by Gauss's method?

\begin{bmatrix}{x}&{y}&{(m-1)z}&{1}\\{x}&{(m-1)y}&{z}&{m-1}\\{(m-1)x}&{y}&{z}&{m+2}\end{bmatrix}

NOTE: the last column are the independent terms

Thank you very much

Hey inverse and welcome to the forums.

If this is an augmented system [M | v], then you can reduce this whole thing to reduced row echelon form and then consider what values of m actually make sense in the context of there being no solutions, a unique solution, or infinitely many solutions if any of those categories exist.

The easiest way to check that you have done the reduction carefully, is to multiply your calculated inverse by your original matrix and you should get the identity if you end up getting a properly row-reduced system. It looks like you should get an inverse as long as m <> 2 by visual inspection, but you would have to check algebraically.

If you post your final row-reduced system and thus your calculated inverse for a general m, then as long as the determinant is non-zero for valid m, we can double check your inverse by multiplying that by the original matrix to get an identity.

This is really the hardest part since checking for inconsistent solutions is basically looking for 0 = 1 type arguments and infinite-solutions happens when you have 0 determinant and not a 0 = 1 situation.
 
Thank you chiro

Otherwise, to stagger the matrix, one can argue for m = 2 and m = -1, for m = 2 is a row which becomes zero, therefore range <number of unknowns Undetermined System Compatible but m = -1 is a row which becomes zero, then range is 2 <number of unknowns should be compatible system Undetermined, but as I see a non-zero constant term and the others are zeros, I deduce that it's an imcompatible system, but as you can known analytically?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top