Displaying change via 'slope'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hexa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Slope
hexa
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I started running a few weeks back and I want to know if I'm improving speed-, distance- and duration-wise.

I have a set of data like these (this is bogus data), currently in Excel:
  1. 15
  2. 13
  3. 16
  4. 17
  5. 15
  6. 15
  7. 14
  8. 17
  9. 17

and I want to know if these numbers get larger with time. How would I do that. I calculated the slope with ongoing number on the x-axis and the changing value on the y-axis. If this is a correct way, what does that number actually tell me regarding the grade of improvement? Is there a much better way to do so?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Without knowing what generated these numbers it's impossible to know for sure whether or not they are getting larger, but you can still make a decent guess using slopes.

The way I would do it woudl be to calculate the slope between each point and take the average, you should get a good idea as to how the number set is behaving. Given how close your actual values are, though, and how few of them you have, it may not be terribly accureate, however.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top