Displaying mathematical expressions/equations/arguements

  • Thread starter Thread starter brusier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding effective ways to display mathematical expressions and equations in a web forum. Users are seeking programs that allow conventional formatting, such as superscripts for exponents and radicals for square roots. Suggestions include using LaTeX for clear mathematical notation, with links to tutorials provided for guidance. It's noted that the forum requires the use of the "tex" tag instead of the typical dollar sign for math mode. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for accessible tools to represent mathematical arguments clearly online.
brusier
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I can see myself utilizing this web forum from time to time to seek advice, opinions, help etc.

Some of this may come in the form of mathemetical expressions or equations.

Is there a good program that allows for data input for mathematical expressions in the conventional format e.g. indicating X^2 by actually placing the 2 on the upper right side of the X. Or, by indicating the sq rt of a value by writing a radical over the expression.

I noticed the icons at the top of the message field and am experimenting with them, but they seem minimal.

X2

anyway, I'm just trying to find a way to easily (relatively) and clearly indicate mathematical expressions and arguements.

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/help/tpl/textprocessing/ltxprimer-1.0.pdf

Or just google latex tutorial.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki/index.php/LaTeX a tutorial that focuses on typing mathematics

You can skip the parts under download and basics and go right to math if you just need to use it on the forum. Note that this forum doesn't recognize $ as a delimiter to start math mode, you'll have to use the "tex" tag.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
The solution to
\[
\sqrt{x} = 5
\]
is
\[
x=25.
\]
\end{document}
 
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{align*}
2x^2 + 3(x-1)(x-2) & = 2x^2 + 3(x^2-3x+2)\\
&= 2x^2 + 3x^2 - 9x + 6\\
&= 5x^2 - 9x + 6
\end{align*}
\end{document}
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top