Disproving Einstein's Energy-Mass Relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter nykill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
AI Thread Summary
A user claims to have a derivation that disproves Einstein's energy-mass relation, E=mc², and seeks advice on how to present this to the public without losing credit. The discussion highlights contradictions in the user's statements and emphasizes the need for logical proof and validation from experts. Participants suggest consulting university professors for feedback and stress the importance of noting assumptions in any new proof. There is skepticism regarding the validity of the claim, with some arguing that E=mc² remains accurate under specific conditions. The conversation reflects a mix of curiosity, skepticism, and the challenges of challenging established scientific principles.
nykill
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
friends i have a derivation which proves that Einstein's Energy mass relation is wrong. I know as far as my knowledge is concerned its true, but want to disclose the thing in front of the world without lossing the credit. Can anyone tell me how this can be done ...will soon disclose the alternate proof of Einsteins energy mass relation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll alert the media. :rolleyes:
 
First you say:
nykill said:
...i have a derivation which proves that Einstein's Energy mass relation is wrong.
Then contradictorily you say:
will soon disclose the alternate proof of Einsteins energy mass relation
You cannot prove anything unless you first learn logic.
 
Don't mind them, it's probably that they've heard it many times before from many people. You said you're pretty sure the work you did. So why need someone to check? I say just disclose it to the world! But if you really want other to check it out for you, you can bring it to any University near you and meet the professors there have them take a look at your paper. I've done that many times with my homework.
 
This isn't homework. This is 100 years of physics.
 
Don't forget to note the assumptions too. Certainly E=mc^2 is wrong in certain conditions. Not just because that it using a rounding of boolean equations but because it assumes the the particles to be massless.

We end up using, E^2 = (pc)^2+(mc^2)^2
 
Surely you mean that E=mc^2 assumes the particles are at rest... The rest is correct (Photons obey E=pc as the m^2c^4 term is equal to zero).
 
To prove that E=mc² is wrong u need a valid proof, more than any equation...

If u can tell that the fusion happenning in the sun making it shine doesn't rely on such an equation than u cna wrote another one based on ur new assumptions...

If u can say that nuclear fissions, nuclear bombs, hydrogen bomb aren't applications for it, than u can easily prove it wrong...

When Einstein made that up, probably he didn't forsee many things that were the result of hsi work, but he was thinking why...He had some image in his mind, Einstein wasn't very good at formulating stuff, and there was the time he needed mathematical help...

So why do u want to prove such a beautifull equation wrong??
 
Einstein wasn't very good at formulating stuff

Yeah, Einstein wasn't very smart at all :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top