Disproving Velocity's Effect on Space-Time

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stevedgarcia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space-time Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the assertion that increased velocity does not curve space-time but compresses it uniformly across all four dimensions. Key points include the application of the Lorentz factor, which contracts space and dilates time equally at relativistic speeds. The conversation also highlights that time dilation affects only objects within the traveling frame, negating any external field effects. Ultimately, the principle of relativity maintains that straight lines in one inertial frame correspond to straight lines in another, reinforcing the idea that velocity does not induce curvature in space-time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lorentz factor in special relativity
  • Familiarity with the principles of time dilation and length contraction
  • Knowledge of inertial frames in physics
  • Basic comprehension of the geometry of space-time
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lorentz transformation and its implications in special relativity
  • Explore the concept of time dilation in detail with practical examples
  • Investigate the geometry of space-time and its representation in physics
  • Examine thought experiments related to relativistic speeds and their outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of space-time and velocity effects in theoretical physics.

stevedgarcia
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
For the past few weeks, I've been struggling with the idea that velocity must curve space-time because of phenomena such as time dilation. Initially, I believed that because time is a component of space-time, through the phenomena of time dilation, velocity must curve space-time. I think I reasoned my way out though. Let me know if I fouled up somewhere.

1) Travelling at relativistic speeds contracts space by a speed dependent factor (namely, the Lorentz factor)
2) Travelling at relativistic speeds dilates time by a speed dependent factor (namely, the Lorentz factor)
3) Therefore, traveling at relativistic speeds contracts space and time by the same factor
4) Thus, space-time does not curve with increased velocity, but instead, it compresses in all 4 dimensions equally in a way

Furthermore, time dilation occurs only to objects within the object traveling at relativistic speeds. So, there is no (1/r^2) or any such field parameter felt by surrounding objects. Therefore, there is no curving of space-time induced by increased velocity.

Earlier, when I was trying to figure what the hell I was thinking about, I read a post about this topic. Somebody posted an interesting thought experiment:

"Now here is an interesting thought experiment. Imagine a train on a long straight horizontal monorail that is suspended from springs that directly measure the weight of the train and the rail. When the train is accelerated to the same velocity as the bullet in the OP [relativistic velocity] will the track scales directly measure the train to be 7 time heavier?"

I believe the answer is no for the reasons stated above. Also, it's interesting to consider whether, due to contraction and all, would the train even be able to stay on the track. I think not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stevedgarcia said:
Thus, space-time does not curve with increased velocity, but instead, it compresses in all 4 dimensions equally in a way
You are correct that spacetime does not curve due to velocity. This is actually part of the meaning of the principle of relativity. Straight lines in one inertial frame map to straight lines in another inertial frame, not curved lines.

However, the Lorentz transform is not a compression, but rather a shear. A unit cube of spacetime is not mapped to a smaller or larger cube, but a rhomboid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K