Distance between point charges in equilibrium (simple)

AI Thread Summary
To determine the location of a third charge that experiences no net force between two fixed charges of +1.07 µC and -3.28 µC, the equilibrium condition requires that the forces exerted by the two charges on the third charge be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. The initial calculations led to an imaginary distance, indicating a mistake in the setup. Upon reevaluation, it was noted that the third charge should not be placed closer to the larger magnitude charge. Correcting the placement of the charges and ensuring the forces are balanced resolved the issue, leading to the correct answer. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying Coulomb's law in equilibrium problems.
Mitocarta
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two fixed charges, +1.07 uC and -3.28 uC, are 61.8 cm apart. Where may a third charge be located so that no net force acts on it?

Homework Equations



Coulombs law

The Attempt at a Solution



q1 = 1.07 uC
q2 = -3.28 uC
q3 = q

q1 ----- q2 ----- q

q1 and q2 are separated by 0.618 m and q2 and q are separated by x

Since the charges are in equilibrium,


0 = k (1.07E-6)(q) / (0.618+x)^2 + k(1.07E-6)(q) / (x)^2

factoring out and eliminating k and q,

(1.07E-6)/(0.618+x)^2 + (3.28E-6)/(x)^2 = 0

Solving for x gives me an imaginary distance. I feel like this is a very simple problem but I can't spot my error. What am I doing incorrectly? Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Mitocarta, welcome to PF!

You've placed q closer to the larger magnitude charge. Is that going to work?
 
TSny said:
Hello Mitocarta, welcome to PF!

You've placed q closer to the larger magnitude charge. Is that going to work?

Thank you for replying. When I switch the charges,

(3.28E-6)/(0.618+x)^2 + (1.07E-6)/(x)^2 = 0

I still get an imaginary answer.
Edit: Is there a way to input math in an easier to read format on this forum?
 
The two forces act in opposite directions on q. The net force will be zero if the magnitudes of the forces are equal to each other.
 
TSny said:
The two forces act in opposite directions on q. The net force will be zero if the magnitudes of the forces are equal to each other.

Oh I was overlooking that! Thank you so much, got the correct answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top