Distance between point charges in equilibrium (simple)

AI Thread Summary
To determine the location of a third charge that experiences no net force between two fixed charges of +1.07 µC and -3.28 µC, the equilibrium condition requires that the forces exerted by the two charges on the third charge be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. The initial calculations led to an imaginary distance, indicating a mistake in the setup. Upon reevaluation, it was noted that the third charge should not be placed closer to the larger magnitude charge. Correcting the placement of the charges and ensuring the forces are balanced resolved the issue, leading to the correct answer. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying Coulomb's law in equilibrium problems.
Mitocarta
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two fixed charges, +1.07 uC and -3.28 uC, are 61.8 cm apart. Where may a third charge be located so that no net force acts on it?

Homework Equations



Coulombs law

The Attempt at a Solution



q1 = 1.07 uC
q2 = -3.28 uC
q3 = q

q1 ----- q2 ----- q

q1 and q2 are separated by 0.618 m and q2 and q are separated by x

Since the charges are in equilibrium,


0 = k (1.07E-6)(q) / (0.618+x)^2 + k(1.07E-6)(q) / (x)^2

factoring out and eliminating k and q,

(1.07E-6)/(0.618+x)^2 + (3.28E-6)/(x)^2 = 0

Solving for x gives me an imaginary distance. I feel like this is a very simple problem but I can't spot my error. What am I doing incorrectly? Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Mitocarta, welcome to PF!

You've placed q closer to the larger magnitude charge. Is that going to work?
 
TSny said:
Hello Mitocarta, welcome to PF!

You've placed q closer to the larger magnitude charge. Is that going to work?

Thank you for replying. When I switch the charges,

(3.28E-6)/(0.618+x)^2 + (1.07E-6)/(x)^2 = 0

I still get an imaginary answer.
Edit: Is there a way to input math in an easier to read format on this forum?
 
The two forces act in opposite directions on q. The net force will be zero if the magnitudes of the forces are equal to each other.
 
TSny said:
The two forces act in opposite directions on q. The net force will be zero if the magnitudes of the forces are equal to each other.

Oh I was overlooking that! Thank you so much, got the correct answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top