Distance between two complex numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the distance between two complex numbers represented as vectors on an Argand diagram. The user seeks confirmation on their notation and understanding, particularly regarding the relationship between vectors and their magnitudes. It is clarified that while vector PQ equals z(2) - z(1), the magnitude of vector PQ is represented as |z(2) - z(1)|, emphasizing that a vector and its magnitude are distinct concepts. The distinction between vectors and their magnitudes is reinforced, highlighting that one is a geometric entity while the other is a numerical value. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate representation in complex number calculations.
naav
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi...i was wondering if someone could confirm if what i have below is correct...thanks...sorry i can't present a diagram...

z(1) = x + iy and z(2) = x(2) + iy(2) are represented by the vectors OP and OQ on an argand diagram...(O is the origin)...imagine the argand diagram...the upper left hand quadrant...(OQ has an argument of say 30 degrees and OP has an argument of 45 degrees - these pieces of information are not relevant anyway)...

is the following correct...

vector OP + vector PQ = vector OQ...

then vector PQ = vector OQ - vector OP

then vector PQ = |z(2) - z(1)|...

1. was wondering if my notation and understanding here is correct...i used algebra in the second line so i was wondering if that is legit...?...

2. is it correct to say in the last line the vector = the magnitude
...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
naav said:
1. was wondering if my notation and understanding here is correct...i used algebra in the second line so i was wondering if that is legit...?...
That's fine.
2. is it correct to say in the last line the vector = the magnitude
That's wrong. You should have:

\vec{PQ} = z_2 - z_1

|\vec{PQ}| = |z_2 - z_1|

Or, in plain text:

vector PQ = z(2) - z(1)
|vector PQ| = |z(2) - z(1)|
 
Hi...thank you very much...

i said in my earlier post...

then vector PQ = |z(2) - z(1)|...

and it was said that it should be...

|vector PQ| = |z(2) - z(1)|

1. isn't that the same thing...

that vector PQ = the magnitude of [z(2) - z(1)]...?...
 
No, it is not the same thing: |vector PQ| is a number (the length of the vector PQ), not a vector.

Likewise "vector PQ" is a vector while "the magnitude of [z(2)-z(1)]" is a number.
 
thank you very much...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top