B Distance Expansion When Moving Away from an Object?

Karagoz
Messages
51
Reaction score
5
In a physics video on YouTube it's told that moving away from an object causes eextension of the length.

(Link: from 6:00, but video is Norwegian)

Imagine:

From planet B to planet C, the distance is 20 light years.
And from planet A to planet B the distance is 20 light years.
We are on planet B and observing it from there.

A rocket is moving towards the planet C with velocity 0.9685c relative to us.

In this case the Lorentz factor will be ca 4.

In the picture below, the rocket is right below the planet B.

Contraction.png


So the astronauts will see the distance to the planet C as 20/4 = 5 light years. This is called length contraction.

But they are moving away from planet A. So they'll observe the distance to planet A as 4*20 = 80 light years.

Is this true?

Does the distance contraction happen only if the object is moving towards the other object?

And the distance will extend if the object is moving away from the other object?

Or the distance both to planet A and B will contract?
 

Attachments

  • Contraction.png
    Contraction.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 708
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Karagoz said:
Is this true?
No.
 
Karagoz said:
Or the distance both to planet A and B will contract?

Yes!
 
As far as the rocket is concerned, the distance between planets A and B and the distance between planets B and C will both be 5 light years and the total distance between planets A and C will be 10 light years.
 
Karagoz said:
So the astronauts will see the distance to the planet C as 20/4 = 5 light years. This is called length contraction.
Karagoz said:
So they'll observe
As always with relativity, you have to distinguish what an observer actually sees at some moment, i.e., what light signals arrive to the observer at that moment, from how things appear in that observer's inertial frame, i.e., what time and space coordinates the observer assigns to different events. This is a very common source of confusion and a bad use of language in my opinion. The typical thing to do in relativity is to deal with space-time coordinates and this is typically what is meant by colloquial phrases such as "observer A sees". I try to avoid such phrases when teaching and instead stick to more precise formulations.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top