Distance light travels in a relatively moving frame?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reikoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frame Light
Reikoku
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if say.. you have a particle moving at 0.5c in the +x direction and a lightbulb at relative rest to the particle.
The particle passes the lightbulb at t_{0}
The lightbulb then flashes, the wave reaches the particle at a particular point, and the speed of light is then measured (by the particle) to be c. Does this then mean that the light wave will then travel a distance of ct from that point in the reference frame of the particle; t being any point in time that the particle wishes to measure the distance of the light wave from it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reikoku said:
I was wondering if say.. you have a particle moving at 0.5c in the +x direction and a lightbulb at relative rest to the particle.
The particle passes the lightbulb at t_{0}
If the particle and lightbulb are at relative rest, how can they pass each other?
 
Doc Al said:
If the particle and lightbulb are at relative rest, how can they pass each other?

Oh am I using the wrong terminology? I meant to say that the particle is moving with 0.5c compared to the lightbulb.
 
Reikoku said:
I meant to say that the particle is moving with 0.5c compared to the lightbulb.
OK.
Reikoku said:
Does this then mean that the light wave will then travel a distance of ct from that point in the reference frame of the particle; t being any point in time that the particle wishes to measure the distance of the light wave from it.
Yes.
 
Thanks Doc Al, that's helped clear up confusion.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
Back
Top