I Distinguishing Einstein Cartan from GR: Experiments

Messages
36,404
Reaction score
15,117
Are there any experiments either already performed or even simply proposed that could be used to distinguish Einstein Cartan gravity from GR?

My current understanding is that they are the same in vacuum, and only differ in matter. In matter the Einstein Cartan metric can have torsion, unlike the GR metric, but in vacuum they agree. Because of the way spin is related to torsion in Einstein Cartan and how important spin is in QM, it seems like that might be a viable candidate for GR violations.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not aware of any observation of torsion yet. It's difficult, because all our tests of GR vs. alternative theories of gravitation rely on huge (astronomical) macroscopic objects. So spin doesn't play a role but only macroscopic descriptions of matter (aka hydrodynamics) and the electromagnetic field, which in the gauge approach to gravity a la Kibble lead to standard GR.
 
The University of Washington gravity guys tried to build a high angular momentum source/target. It was a mix of two materials magnetized in opposite directions, but one had more spin than the other. This would allow them to test spin-dependent gravity. I don't know how far they got with this.

Even so, this device was many tens of orders of magnitude less sensitive than they would need to distinguish GR from Einstein-Cartan.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71, Ibix, Dale and 1 other person
vanhees71 said:
I'm not aware of any observation of torsion yet. It's difficult, because all our tests of GR vs. alternative theories of gravitation rely on huge (astronomical) macroscopic objects. So spin doesn't play a role but only macroscopic descriptions of matter (aka hydrodynamics) and the electromagnetic field, which in the gauge approach to gravity a la Kibble lead to standard GR.

In neutron stars the spins align resulting in a total big spin. That should result in some modification in the state/equilibrium equation of the star, I think.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dale
Poplawski writes a lot about Einstein-Cartan theory. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269310011561 has a high citation count, it may or not be helpful. Unfortunately, I think Poplawski focuses on the aspect of the theory that predicts that BH collapse "bounces" in Einstein-Cartan theory, which may not be the sort of experimentally testable prediction you're looking for.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71 and Dale
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top