I Distinguishing Einstein Cartan from GR: Experiments

Messages
36,427
Reaction score
15,144
Are there any experiments either already performed or even simply proposed that could be used to distinguish Einstein Cartan gravity from GR?

My current understanding is that they are the same in vacuum, and only differ in matter. In matter the Einstein Cartan metric can have torsion, unlike the GR metric, but in vacuum they agree. Because of the way spin is related to torsion in Einstein Cartan and how important spin is in QM, it seems like that might be a viable candidate for GR violations.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not aware of any observation of torsion yet. It's difficult, because all our tests of GR vs. alternative theories of gravitation rely on huge (astronomical) macroscopic objects. So spin doesn't play a role but only macroscopic descriptions of matter (aka hydrodynamics) and the electromagnetic field, which in the gauge approach to gravity a la Kibble lead to standard GR.
 
The University of Washington gravity guys tried to build a high angular momentum source/target. It was a mix of two materials magnetized in opposite directions, but one had more spin than the other. This would allow them to test spin-dependent gravity. I don't know how far they got with this.

Even so, this device was many tens of orders of magnitude less sensitive than they would need to distinguish GR from Einstein-Cartan.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71, Ibix, Dale and 1 other person
vanhees71 said:
I'm not aware of any observation of torsion yet. It's difficult, because all our tests of GR vs. alternative theories of gravitation rely on huge (astronomical) macroscopic objects. So spin doesn't play a role but only macroscopic descriptions of matter (aka hydrodynamics) and the electromagnetic field, which in the gauge approach to gravity a la Kibble lead to standard GR.

In neutron stars the spins align resulting in a total big spin. That should result in some modification in the state/equilibrium equation of the star, I think.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dale
Poplawski writes a lot about Einstein-Cartan theory. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269310011561 has a high citation count, it may or not be helpful. Unfortunately, I think Poplawski focuses on the aspect of the theory that predicts that BH collapse "bounces" in Einstein-Cartan theory, which may not be the sort of experimentally testable prediction you're looking for.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71 and Dale
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Back
Top