MHB Distribution of Y: cX+d | X~uniform(0,1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter oyth94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution
oyth94
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Let X~ uniform(0,1), ie f(x) = 1/(R-L) for L<x<R and c<0. Let Y= cX+d. What is the distribution of Y?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
oyth94 said:
Let X~ uniform(0,1), ie f(x) = 1/(R-L) for L<x<R and c<0. Let Y= cX+d. What is the distribution of Y?
Think about what happen to X when you add d.

Or

Try to think about what would happen if you only have c*X

What would happen if d was equal to 1?
 
I rearranged Y=cX+d to get X=(Y-d)/c and substitute it into L<x<R
So it's L< (Y-d)/c < R => cL + d < Y< cR+d
So is that the dist. of Y?
 
oyth94 said:
I rearranged Y=cX+d to get X=(Y-d)/c and substitute it into L<x<R
So it's L< (Y-d)/c < R => cL + d < Y< cR+d
So is that the dist. of Y?

Hi oyth94! :)

Yes, that is the case.
Btw, you can make your result a little more specific.
Note that your X distribution is U(0,1).
Those 0 and 1 mean that your L=0 and your R=1...
It also means that you can write Y ~ U(a,b) for some a and b.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top