Distribution of Y: cX+d | X~uniform(0,1)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter oyth94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The distribution of Y, defined as Y = cX + d where X follows a uniform distribution U(0,1) and c < 0, results in Y being uniformly distributed between the bounds cL + d and cR + d. Given that L = 0 and R = 1, the distribution simplifies to Y ~ U(d, c + d). This conclusion is reached by rearranging the equation and substituting the limits of X into the derived inequalities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of uniform distributions, specifically U(0,1)
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Knowledge of linear transformations in probability
  • Familiarity with the concepts of bounds in probability distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of linear transformations of random variables
  • Study the implications of changing parameters in uniform distributions
  • Learn about the effects of negative scaling on distributions
  • Investigate the relationship between uniform distributions and other types of distributions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and students studying probability theory who are interested in understanding the effects of linear transformations on uniform distributions.

oyth94
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Let X~ uniform(0,1), ie f(x) = 1/(R-L) for L<x<R and c<0. Let Y= cX+d. What is the distribution of Y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oyth94 said:
Let X~ uniform(0,1), ie f(x) = 1/(R-L) for L<x<R and c<0. Let Y= cX+d. What is the distribution of Y?
Think about what happen to X when you add d.

Or

Try to think about what would happen if you only have c*X

What would happen if d was equal to 1?
 
I rearranged Y=cX+d to get X=(Y-d)/c and substitute it into L<x<R
So it's L< (Y-d)/c < R => cL + d < Y< cR+d
So is that the dist. of Y?
 
oyth94 said:
I rearranged Y=cX+d to get X=(Y-d)/c and substitute it into L<x<R
So it's L< (Y-d)/c < R => cL + d < Y< cR+d
So is that the dist. of Y?

Hi oyth94! :)

Yes, that is the case.
Btw, you can make your result a little more specific.
Note that your X distribution is U(0,1).
Those 0 and 1 mean that your L=0 and your R=1...
It also means that you can write Y ~ U(a,b) for some a and b.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K