Diverging Series: Proving Logarithmic Divergence with Real x

  • Thread starter Thread starter happyg1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergent Series
happyg1
Messages
304
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm working on this problem:
Prove that for any real x, the series SUM n=2 to infinity of 1/(log n)^x diverges.

So far, I have applied the test that says that if SUM 2^n*a_2n converges then the series converges. I got:

1/log2*SUM 2^n/n^x I know that 1/n^x converges if x>1, but 2^n will explode, so I'd have convergent (sometimes) times divergent = divergent. Can I do that?

Thanks,
CC
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that is not a propery of series. A counter exemple is

\sum \frac{1}{n}\frac{1}{n^2}

In this case, we have divergent times convergeant = convergeant.

What you can do to prove the desired result however, is simply show that for all x in R, the limit as n-->infty of the argument of the serie is not 0. Hence it does not converges, hence it diverges. (You'll have to do the 3 separate cases x<0, x=0 and x>0 [the later being the most difficult]).
 
I tried it using the ratio test. I got
\2(\frac{n}{n+1})^x[\tex]<br /> and the limit of that is 2&gt;1 so it diverges.<br /> can I do it that way?<br /> CC
 
let me try again...I'm still learning latex...
\mbox{2}(\frac{n}{n+1})^x
there. And the limit of THAT is 2.
Is this correct?
 
happyg1 said:
let me try again...I'm still learning latex...
\mbox{2}(\frac{n}{n+1})^x
there. And the limit of THAT is 2.
Is this correct?
Yes.
\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 2 \left( \frac{n}{n+1}\right)^x=2[/itex]<br /> <br /> But<br /> \frac{(\log n)^x}{(\log n+1)^x} \neq 2 \left( \frac{n}{n+1}\right)^x
 
Last edited:
You should do it my way. It's much more instructive then mechanically using a test anyway.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top