Dividing by trigonometric functions

AI Thread Summary
Dividing by a trigonometric function like cosθ is generally discouraged due to the potential for it to equal zero, which would make the division undefined. However, in the context of projectile motion, if θ is defined as the angle of launch, it cannot be 90 degrees or 270 degrees, as these angles would imply no horizontal displacement. Therefore, as long as θ is not equal to those values, dividing by cosθ is valid. The discussion also highlighted a typo in the equations where "25" mistakenly became "250." Overall, the approach to solving for time t is correct, provided the angle does not lead to a zero cosine value.
frozonecom
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hello. I was doing a (simple) physics problem and stumbled with a mathematical problem.

I was doing a projectile motions problem and I have set up my equation like this:Δx = Vi (cosθ) (t)
270= 25cosθ t
t = 270 / (250cosθ)

And this is where I'm having problems.
I know from my high school trig that doing division by a trig function is invalid since cosθ can be zero. However, I see no other way to express t (time) with other equations I know.

So, my main question is, is what I did a valid move algebraically?
Are there any exceptions to that rule about dividing by trigonometric functions?

Note: I actually saw a yahooanswer post about this but I really want to know physicsforums's say about this. I know this might come as an easy question for some but it really came very confusing for me.
Help would be very appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In the equation 270= 25cosθ t if assume cosθ to be 0, you will get 270=0! This is not possible. ∴cosθ≠0 and hence you can divide cosθ and get an equation for t.

I think you meant
t = 270 / (25cosθ) and not t = 270 / (250cosθ):confused:
 
frozonecom said:
Hello. I was doing a (simple) physics problem and stumbled with a mathematical problem.

I was doing a projectile motions problem and I have set up my equation like this:


Δx = Vi (cosθ) (t)
270= 25cosθ t
t = 270 / (250cosθ)

And this is where I'm having problems.
I know from my high school trig that doing division by a trig function is invalid since cosθ can be zero. However, I see no other way to express t (time) with other equations I know.

[/QUOTE]

You do not divide with a cosine function, but with a number. Theta is a well defined angle in case of projectile motion, the angle the projectile was thrown at with respect to the horizontal. It must be 90 (-90) degrees to get cosθ=0 and that corresponds throwing it vertically up or down. There is no horizontal displacement in these cases.

ehild
 
frozonecom said:
Hello. I was doing a (simple) physics problem and stumbled with a mathematical problem.

I was doing a projectile motions problem and I have set up my equation like this:Δx = Vi (cosθ) (t)
270= 25cosθ t
t = 270 / (250cosθ)

And this is where I'm having problems.
I know from my high school trig that doing division by a trig function is invalid since cosθ can be zero. However, I see no other way to express t (time) with other equations I know.
cos(\theta) can be 0 but you should be able to realize that in a problem like this, it won't be! cos(theta)= 0 for \theta 90 degrees or 270 degrees. I presume your \theta is the angle the trajectory makes with the horizontal so it can't be 270 degrees and 90 degrees means the projective is 'fired' straight up. And, of course, if the projective goes straight up, it will come straight back down- so you could do that case separately. There is no objection to saying "Clearly, if \theta cannot be 90 because then the ball will not have ANY horizontal motion and x can never be 270. If \theta is not 90 degrees, cos(\theta) is not 0 so we can divide by cos(\theta)&quot;.<br /> <br /> (I <b>do</b> have an objection to the &quot;25&quot; in one equation becoming &quot;250&quot; in the next! May we assume that extra &quot;0&quot; is a typo?)<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> So, my main question is, is what I did a valid move algebraically?<br /> Are there any exceptions to that rule about dividing by trigonometric functions?<br /> <br /> Note: I actually saw a yahooanswer post about this but I really want to know physicsforums&#039;s say about this. I know this might come as an easy question for some but it really came very confusing for me.<br /> Help would be very appreciated. </div> </div> </blockquote>
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top