MHB Is the Dividing Problem Involving Primes Solvable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation involving primes, specifically 7(p1-1)...(pk-1) = 3p1...pk. It is established that if pk is the largest prime, then pk must be greater than or equal to 7 due to the division by 7 on the left-hand side. The argument further concludes that if p1 is not equal to 2, the terms would yield an even product on one side and an odd product on the other, leading to the necessity of p1 being 2. Consequently, this implies k must equal 2, resulting in the conclusion that p2 must be 7. The discussion ultimately explores the conditions under which the dividing problem involving primes can be solved.
Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
I can't see why the following is true:
Let $p_{1}<p_{2}<...<p_{k}$ be primes such that

$7(p_{1}-1)...(p_{k}-1)=3p_{1}...p_{k}$.

Since 7 divides the LHS, $p_{k}>or =7$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: dividing problem

Poirot said:
I can't see why the following is true:
Let $p_{1}<p_{2}<...<p_{k}$ be primes such that

$7(p_{1}-1)...(p_{k}-1)=3p_{1}...p_{k}$.

Since 7 divides the LHS, $p_{k}>or =7$

If $p_{1} \ne 2$ then the term $(p_{1}-1)\ ...\ (p_{k}-1)$ is even and the term $p_{1}\ ...\ p_{k}$ is odd ... that's impossible so that it must be $p_{1}=2$. In this case the term $(p_{1}-1)\ ...\ (p_{k}-1)$ contains as factor $2^{k-1}$ and the term $p_{1}\ ...\ p_{k}$ contains as factor 2, so that it must be k=2. In this case it is... $\displaystyle 7\ (p_{2}-1)= 3\ 2\ p_{2} \implies p_{2}=7$ (2)Kind regards$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top