Do all polar substances dissolve in water?

AI Thread Summary
Not all polar substances dissolve in water, despite the common principle that "like dissolves like." While many polar substances do dissolve due to their interactions with water molecules, there are exceptions where certain polar compounds may not be soluble. The discussion acknowledges the tendency for polar substances to dissolve but also recognizes that chemistry often presents exceptions to general rules. Participants express confidence in the idea that polar substances typically dissolve in water, but caution that exceptions may exist. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that most polar substances are soluble in water.
temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Do all polar substances dissolve in water?


Homework Equations


None.


The Attempt at a Solution


I think the answer is yes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure this is yes. Like dissolves like. Then again, chemistry is fond of having exceptions to the rules...

but I'd still say yes.
 
I can't think of an exception right now, so I'd say yes too (although there is probably one)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top