Do Braking Distances Prevent a Collision in This Scenario?

  • Thread starter Thread starter limonade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a scenario where a driver, traveling at 85 km/h, must determine if they will collide with a car ahead moving at 60 km/h after applying brakes with a deceleration of 4.2 m/s². The calculations show that the driver takes approximately 5.62 seconds to stop completely, covering a distance of 66.32 meters. Meanwhile, the car in front, moving at a constant speed, travels 103.69 meters in the same time frame. Since the two cars do not occupy the same position after 5.62 seconds, a collision is avoided. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding relative speeds and stopping distances in collision scenarios.
limonade
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You're speeding at 85 km/h when you notice that you're only 10m behind the car in front of you, which is moving at the legal speed limit of 60 km/h. You slam on your brakes, and your car decelerates at 4.2 m/s^2. Assuming the car in front of you continues at constant speed, will you collide? if so, at what relative speed? if not what will the distance between the cars at their closest approach?

2. Homework Equations

Equations of motion for constant acceleration


The Attempt at a Solution




Please tell me if my reasoning is correct or where I am making a mistake.


I set the position where my car is when I start braking to be t=0, and this position to be x0=0


My initial velocity is 85km/h=23.61 m/s

My acceleration is -4.2 m/s2


For the car I may possibly collide with,

their initial velocity is 60 km/h= 16.6 m/sec

and their acceleration is zero





To come to a complete stop, my final velocity will be zero.

Using v=v0+at

0=23.6 m/s -4.2m/s2t
and solving for t I get t=5.62 seconds to stop completely.

Next I tried to find my position in this time relative to where I started at x0=0

using x=x0+.5(v0+v)t

x=0+.5(23.6)(5.62)



=66.32 meters





Then I tried to see where car #2 would be in the same amount of time
using x=x0+v0t+.5at2

and I get x=10+16.67(5.62)+0


where last term goes to zero as car #2 is not accelerating.


x= 103.69 meters relative to the origin




Since the position of the two cars is not equal in 5.62 seconds, the two cars don't collide.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
"To come to a complete stop, my final velocity will be zero."

But you don't need to come to a complete stop, do you? You just need to slow down to the speed of the car ahead of you.
 
yeah. Never mind X/

Sorry
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top