Do bunched particles form a unified field?

jaketodd
Gold Member
Messages
507
Reaction score
21
When the energy of a particle bunch of electrons is measured in a particle accelerator (like in an energy resolving chamber/energy resolving slits), is the measurement indicative of the energy of the whole bunch?

Thanks,

Jake
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaketodd said:
When the energy of a particle bunch of electrons is measured in a particle accelerator (like in an energy resolving chamber/energy resolving slits), is the measurement indicative of the energy of the whole bunch?

Thanks,

Jake

Er.. if you pass the bunch into an energy spectrometer, you will get a SPREAD in energy, with hopefully the majority of the electrons in the bunch having the "right" energy that one wants. How good of a quality of the beam is and how it has been manipulated will dictate how much this spread in energy is. Presumably, one wants the smallest spread in energy as possible.

I'm a bit puzzled on how this has anything to do with the unified field.

Zz.
 
Is the spread of energy reliant on how many electrons are in the bunch and how fast they are going? If not, would a *mass* spectrometer's reading be reliant on those two things (because particles effectively gain mass at relativistic speeds due to E=mc^2)? Also, can the bunch be made to continue around the particle accelerator after passing through the energy or mass spectrometer?

Thank you,

Jake
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top