Do Buoyant Forces Depend on the Material's Density?

AI Thread Summary
Buoyant forces depend on the volume of fluid displaced, not the density of the object submerged. In this case, both a 20cm³ block of lead and a 20cm³ block of copper displace the same volume of water, resulting in equal buoyant forces. The calculations show that while lead is denser and heavier, the buoyant force acting on both blocks is the same due to their identical volumes. This means that the buoyant force is independent of the material's density. Therefore, the correct conclusion is that the buoyant force is the same for both blocks.
wondermoose
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 20cm^3 block of lead and a 20cm^3 block of copper are completely under water. Each is suspended by a thread so that they both hand at the same height in an aquarium filled with water. Which of the following is true?

a) The buoyant force is greater on the lead than on the copper
b)*** The buoyant force is greater on the copper than on the lead
c) The buoyant force is the same on both blocks
d) More information is needed


Homework Equations


Fb=\rhovg


The Attempt at a Solution


This problem was on a test and I was pretty sure the correct answer was B, but I was wrong. My revised way of thinking about it is since the volume is the same then the material with the greater density should have the larger buoyant force.

\rholead=11300 kg/m3
and
\rhocopper=8920kg/m3

Soooo

Flead = (11300 kg/m3)(.020 m3)(9.8 m/s2)
= 2214.8

Fcopper = (8920kg/m3)(.020 m3)(9.8 m/s2)
= 1748.3

Flead > Fcopper

Make sense? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have some misconceptions here.

Buoyant Force = Vρg, the V is the volume of liquid displaced, p is the density of the LIQUID displaced.

Hence, the upthrust is the same for both, since in both cases, the liquid and the volume of liquid displaced is the same.

Now, you might ask why is it that both can be at the same height at the water even though the lead block is obviously heavier than the copper block.

This is because Buoyant force + Force exerted by the string = Weight of block.
 
So does that mean the buoyant force is the same for both blocks, regardless of the density of the material? I guess that makes sense, since both blocks are the same dimensions under the same circumstances.

Just to make sure I'm getting this (because I obviously didn't before):

The buoyant force is the same on both blocks because buoyant force is independent of the density of the material.
 
Yes. That's correct.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top