Do Coronal Holes and Sunspots Represent the Same Phenomenon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joellll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Holes
Joellll
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Are coronal holes and sunspots the same things?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You own thoughts are??

We don't give answers here like google does...
 
Coronal holes are the darker spots when viewed on a x ray picture, I've been doing some reading and it says on many websites that coronal holes create CME but it doesn't say anything about coronal mass ejection and sunspots
 
Last edited:
No

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal_hole

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunspot

http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/C/coronal_hole.html
Sunspots are related to lower activity of convection in the sun's photosphere due to an increased magnetic activity. Coronal holes are areas in the sun's corona which are colder and has lower density.

Coronal holes are related to solar wind, and there is some correlation between coronal holes and sun spots, but they are not the same phenomena.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top