Do derivatives introduce loss of solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abraham
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives Loss
Abraham
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
For example, if I want to show that there is no real # solution to

x2 + 24x2 = -1

is it correct to show that

d2/dx2( x4 + 24x2 ) = d2/dx2(-1)

---> 12x2+48 = 0

And since x^2 is >0 or =0, 12x2+48 ---> 0 + 48 \neq 0

Therefore, there is no real number solution to x2 + 24x2 = -1

Is this proper logic? Or does taking the derivatives change the validity(?) of the solution or whatever the proper terminology is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the equation x=1. Taking derivatives yield 1=0.
 
You are confusing equations with functions. The equation:

x4 + 24x2 + 1 = 0

Asks if there is some point (in this case, a real one) such that the above equality is true, not that it's true for all points.

But when you write:

d2/dx2( x4 + 24x2 + 1) = d2/dx2(0)

You are stating that the second derivative of the function

f(x) = x4 + 24x2 + 1

is identically 0. This is the basic logical flaw in your argument.

(You may answer that you meant to say that they are equal at some point, but the second part of your argument contradicts this.)
 
Ok, I get it now. Thanks for the for the quick replies Landau and JSuarez.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top