Can drug tolerance reverse with abstinence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShawnD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tolerance
AI Thread Summary
Tolerance to drugs like caffeine and cocaine develops as users consume more over time, requiring increased amounts to achieve the same effects. This phenomenon can lead to excessive consumption, exemplified by the trend of ordering large caffeinated beverages. When individuals stop using these substances, tolerance can diminish, and in some cases, sensitization may occur. Sensitization results in a heightened response to the drug upon re-exposure, which can be more intense than that experienced by first-time users. The duration of sensitization and the specific usage patterns that contribute to it remain subjects of ongoing debate.
ShawnD
Science Advisor
Messages
715
Reaction score
2
People who consume a lot of drugs, like caffeine or cocaine, eventually build up a kind of tolerance, and they need more and more to get the same effect. This is why many drugs get out of hand, and you suddenly find yourself buying those really big starbucks coffees loaded with enough caffeine to put down a bull elephant. If one were to stop drinking coffee or doing coke or lay off ______ drug, does the tolerance eventually go away?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Eventually, yes. And, if you've used it for a long time and then there's a period of time when you're not using it, something called sensitization can also occur (though there is a lot of debate about long long it lasts and what sort of pattern of usage leads to it). Sensitization means that if you use it again, you'll experience a response much greater than in someone who is a first-time user.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top