I Do electromagnetic waves fade with distance in vacuum?

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic waves do fade with distance due to the inverse square law, which causes energy density to decrease as the wave spreads over a larger area. However, the frequency of the electromagnetic wave remains constant regardless of distance. Signals from outer space retain enough energy to be detected despite the fading, as they start with significant initial energy. Telescopes can capture these signals even after they have traveled thousands of light years. Understanding these principles clarifies how we can detect distant cosmic signals.
yashraj
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Do electromagnetic wave gets weaker with the increasing distance from the source in its travel ?
I want to know that when a charged particle accelerates then the electromagnetic wave so produced will loose it's strength or can say fades with distance or not ? If yes then what happens to its frequency and also tell me if electromagnetic waves fades away with increasing distance from the source then how physicists detects signals from the outer space which have travelled thousands of light years ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

As an EM wave radiates out into space, the energy is distributed over the surface of a radially growing sphere. That causes the EM wave energy density to be reduced by the inverse square law.

The frequency of the EM wave remains the same.

The signals detected from space start out with incredible energy. After the inverse square law has been applied, there is sufficient energy remaining, to enter the aperture of the telescope, and for the signals to be detected.
 
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.

As an EM wave radiates out into space, the energy is distributed over the surface of a radially growing sphere. That causes the EM wave to be reduced by the inverse square law.

The frequency of the EM wave remains the same.

The signals detected from space start out with incredible energy. After the inverse square law has been applied, there is sufficient energy remaining, to enter the aperture of the telescope, and for the signals to be detected.
Thank you for the answer. I was actually thinking almost same but I wanted to make sure that I was right.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top