Do Electrons Orbit Nuclei at the Same Distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Emissive
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Orbit
AI Thread Summary
Electrons do not orbit the nucleus in fixed paths; instead, they exist in probabilistic "clouds." The size of an 's' cloud is consistent across atoms if the nucleus charge, quantum number n, and electron configuration remain unchanged. Adding electrons or changing the nucleus affects the potential and size of the electron cloud, with additional electrons altering the overall volume. Neutrons do not influence the electron cloud size when considering the nucleus's motion. The binding energy of electrons provides insights into the changes in electron configurations, particularly in negative ions like hydride.
Emissive
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Do electrons all orbit an nucleus at the same distance? I.e is an 's' cloud always the same in every atom or does the chance of finding one closer or further to the nucleus change? What about when the spin opposite electron enters the shell?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrons don't "orbit" the nucleus at all.
I.e is an 's' cloud always the same in every atom
If the charge of the nucleus, the quantum number n and the configuration of all other electrons are the same, it is. If you change at least one thing, you get a different result.
 
So let's say we have a hydrogen 1s1 cloud - you are saying it has a different the size volume cloud as its anion hydride 1s2?

What if we add a neutron - is the volume still the same? (i would have guessed that its opposing spin electron would be permitted permitted in the same volume?)
 
Additional electrons change the potential for the electron. The magnitude of the effect depends on the orbitals of the other electrons.
Neutrons don't matter, if you neglect the "motion" of the nucleus.
 
Sticking with hydrogen example - you are saying if we make it an anion (and change the pe).. this makes the orbital more voluminous?
 
I don't find numbers for the size, but the binding energy gives some good hints:
"The Negative Ion of Hydrogen" gives an energy of 14.35 eV for a double ionization. As the electron configuration is symmetric, this corresponds to an energy of ~7 eV per electron, less than the binding energy of a single electron.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top