Do Equations in More Than Three Variables Represent Graphs in Higher Dimensions?

Liger20
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hello, I posted this several weeks ago in another forum, but I never really got a good answer. Could someone please take a look at this an tell me if it's mathematically valid?
Thanks!





Do Equations in More Than Three Variables Represent Graphs in Higher Dimensions?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey, first of all, I'd like to apologize if I'm posting this in the wrong forum. I wasn't sure whether I should post it here or in the mathematics forum. Recently I was going through an Algebra book, and I saw a chapter on solving linear equations in three variables. The book explained how these sets of equations can be solved using elimination, matrices, Cramer's rule, etc. Anyway, I worked several of these problems. When I was finished, just out of curiosity, I wondered what it would be like if I set up five sets of equations with five variables, and solved them. I created one, and using my preferred technique, elimination, I went about solving it and it went MUCH more smoothly than I expected it would. When I was finished, I had the values that I had started out with, and it had all worked out fine. I used five variables X, Y, Z, K, and J. When I had finished, I went back to the book I was using and saw that linear sentences in two variables represented graphs in two dimensions, and linear equations in three variables represent graphs in three dimensions. So here's my question: Do sets of equations with more than three variables represent graphs in higher dimensions?


P.S: Here are the equations I worked. Feel free to point out anything that I may have done wrong.


2x+4y-1z-6k+2j=-1
3x+6y-3z-8k+4j=1
1x+3y+4z-2k+4j=47
4x-2y-2z+6k+2j=28
5x+3y+4z+3k+3j=69

(The values are X=2, Y=3, Z=5, K=4, J=6).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Liger20 said:
Hello, I posted this several weeks ago in another forum, but I never really got a good answer. Could someone please take a look at this an tell me if it's mathematically valid?
Thanks!





Do Equations in More Than Three Variables Represent Graphs in Higher Dimensions?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey, first of all, I'd like to apologize if I'm posting this in the wrong forum. I wasn't sure whether I should post it here or in the mathematics forum. Recently I was going through an Algebra book, and I saw a chapter on solving linear equations in three variables. The book explained how these sets of equations can be solved using elimination, matrices, Cramer's rule, etc. Anyway, I worked several of these problems. When I was finished, just out of curiosity, I wondered what it would be like if I set up five sets of equations with five variables, and solved them. I created one, and using my preferred technique, elimination, I went about solving it and it went MUCH more smoothly than I expected it would. When I was finished, I had the values that I had started out with, and it had all worked out fine. I used five variables X, Y, Z, K, and J. When I had finished, I went back to the book I was using and saw that linear sentences in two variables represented graphs in two dimensions, and linear equations in three variables represent graphs in three dimensions. So here's my question: Do sets of equations with more than three variables represent graphs in higher dimensions?


P.S: Here are the equations I worked. Feel free to point out anything that I may have done wrong.


2x+4y-1z-6k+2j=-1
3x+6y-3z-8k+4j=1
1x+3y+4z-2k+4j=47
4x-2y-2z+6k+2j=28
5x+3y+4z+3k+3j=69

(The values are X=2, Y=3, Z=5, K=4, J=6).
Actually, I would have put it the other way around: a graph represents an equation. Equations don't necessarily "represent" graphs or anything else. An equation is itself and, if it was derived from some application, represents whatever the application is about.

However, it certainly is possible to associate an equation in several variables with a graph. In this case, you have 5 linear equations in 5 variables. It would be possible to solve each of those equations for anyone of the variables "in terms of" the other 4. Given anyone of those 4 values, the 5th is determined. Yes, we could set up a "5 dimensional" coordinate system and each equation would "represent" (or be represented by) a "hyper-plane" in 5 dimensions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top