Do I have the right amount of sig digs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EgpYo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the force experienced by an astronaut on a rotating space station, with a focus on the implications of significant digits in the final answer. The calculated force is 450 N, but the user questions whether it should be rounded to 400 N due to the input speed of 30 m/s being considered as having only one significant digit. Participants clarify that significant digits can be tricky and that the representation of numbers affects how many digits are considered significant. Ultimately, while 450 N technically has three significant figures, it is suggested that a strict adherence to significant digits may not be necessary in this context. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding significant figures without compromising the accuracy of the results.
EgpYo
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To simulate gravity a circular space station with a radius of 150m is rotated so that astronauts on the inner surface move at 30m/s. If a 75kg astronaut stands in a bathroom scale, what reading will it give? In Newtons.

Homework Equations


Fc = mv2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


Fc = Fg

Fg = mv2/r

Fg = (75)(900)/150

Fg = 450 N

Therefore the scale will say 450 N.

I don't get it... 30m/s is 1 sig dig. So my answer should be 400 N? Can somebody confirm this? It just seems weird to write "Therefore the scale will say 400 N" when in reality it will be 50 N greater, which is a big difference. I have to submit my answers for marking and I don't want to lose marks. So are you supposed to use sig digs even if it changes your answer a lot? Because there have been a few instances where I come across questions that should have 1 significant digit in the final answer but that would change my calculated answer by a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EgpYo said:
30m/s is 1 sig dig
Interpreting significant digits from the way numbers are shown is a bit tricky.
Ideally, it should be 3E1 (3*101) to show 1 sig dig, or 3.0E1 to show two, etc. I would take 30 as showing two.
 
Im going to ask you about another question, just to make sure I got the hang of this.

The question gives me 20m and 10m and my final answer was 22m. So this should stay as 22m? Because the only other way you could write 10m is 2x10^1. The fact that it is not written this way means the 0 should be considered significant? Thus, my final answer is 22m instead of 20m.
 
And going back to my original question, wouldn't that mean that 450 has 3 significant figures? Because using that same logic, ideally it should be written as 45x10^1
 
EgpYo said:
Im going to ask you about another question, just to make sure I got the hang of this.

The question gives me 20m and 10m and my final answer was 22m. So this should stay as 22m? Because the only other way you could write 10m is 2x10^1. The fact that it is not written this way means the 0 should be considered significant? Thus, my final answer is 22m instead of 20m.
Yes.
EgpYo said:
And going back to my original question, wouldn't that mean that 450 has 3 significant figures? Because using that same logic, ideally it should be written as 45x10^1
Technically, but it would be a vindictive examiner that faulted you for answering 450.
(But I would prefer 4.5E2 to 45E1.)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top