Do Orthogonal Subsets Spanning the Same Subspace Prove Equality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NATURE.M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces
NATURE.M
Messages
298
Reaction score
0
If I want to show two orthogonal subsets S_{1} and S_{2} of ℝ^{n} both span the same subspace W of ℝ^{n} does it suffice to show that
S_{1}\subsetS_{2} and that S_{2}\subsetS_{1}, thus showing S_{1} = S_{2}
\Rightarrow they span the same space.

If there's a better method, I'd like to know.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that method would work if the two sets are equal but that will almost never be the case. Typically you would want to show that
S_1 \subset span(S_2)
which immediately implies
span(S_1) \subset span(S_2)
at which point since they both have the same size (if they don't then you didn't need to do any work) the two spans must be equal.
 
Office_Shredder said:
Yes, that method would work if the two sets are equal but that will almost never be the case. Typically you would want to show that
S_1 \subset span(S_2)
which immediately implies
span(S_1) \subset span(S_2)
at which point since they both have the same size (if they don't then you didn't need to do any work) the two spans must be equal.

After looking back at my post, I realize I should of wrote span(S_{1}) \subset span(S_{2}) and vice versa. But anyways thanks.
 
OK then yeah you are doing more work than required. If they're orthogonal sets you know their spans have dimension equal to the number of elements. As soon as you have one span is contained in the other you are done, and you don't need to check the other direction.
 
okay that makes sense. thanks!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top