Undergrad Do Pions Exist Naturally in High Z Nuclei and How Do Their Half Lives Change?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevin McHugh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclei Pions
Click For Summary
Pions may exist in high Z nuclei, but their stability and half-lives in bound states remain uncertain. While pions gain energy within a nucleus, this energy is insufficient for them to become stable, as no stable nuclei containing pions have been observed. The half-lives of pions are expected to increase slightly when inside a nucleus, but only by a few percent. The charge of the pion does not significantly affect its interaction with nucleons, as the strong force mediates attractive interactions. Overall, the existence of pions in natural high Z nuclei and their properties continue to be topics of inquiry in nuclear physics.
Kevin McHugh
Messages
318
Reaction score
165
Do they exist in nature, i.e. in high Z nuclei, or are they only created in scattering experiments? Are the half lives increased in bound states? Why do positive pions get trapped in the potential well as well as negative pions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy gain of a pion inside the nucleus is comparable to that of a neutron or proton. Usually it's more because the pion doesn't pay exchange energy. But it's still one order or magnitude less than what would be required to make the pion stable.
People conjectured Strange Matter where baryons containing strange quarks are incorporated into an extremely heavy nucleus, which could stabilize both the nucleus and the strange baryons. But so far no one has found any of that stuff.
 
TTT. Thanks for the reply Gigaz, but that doesn't really answer my questions.
 
There are no stable nuclei that contain pions. All known stable nuclei contain only neutrons and protons.
The half-lifes of pions should be somewhat larger when the pion is inside a nucleus, but not by more than a few percent.
The charge of the pion doesn't matter because it doesn't matter for protons. The interaction is always attractive because it is mediated via the strong force.
 
Thanks Gigaz. That helps a lot.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K