Do Solid Cylinders and Cylindrical Sections Have the Same Rotational Inertia?

AI Thread Summary
Solid cylinders and cylindrical sections with equal radii and mass densities can be assumed to have the same rotational inertia when rotating about their center. The mass distribution across the radius is identical in both cases, leading to the conclusion that their rotational inertias are equal. The derived formula for the rotational inertia of a cylindrical section matches that of a full cylinder, specifically .5MR^2, indicating that the angle measure does not affect the outcome. The discussion raises questions about whether the cylindrical section is rotating about its center of mass and its shape, suggesting further exploration of these concepts. Overall, the analysis supports the idea that both objects exhibit the same rotational inertia under the given conditions.
Zarathustra1
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Let's assume for a moment that we have two objects: a solid cylinder rotating about the center, and a section of a cylinder with a given angle rotating about the center of the would-be cylinder (had it been a full cylinder). They have an equal radii, and we will modify their mass-densities in such a way that the cylinder and the cylindrical section have equal masses.

We can conclude that the mass distribution across the radius is equal in both objects. As such, would it be safe to assume they have the same rotational inertias?

If I did my math correctly, then yes. I attempted to derive a formula for the rotational inertia of a cylindrical section, and it turned out to be same formula for that of a full cylinder: .5MR^2. I was a little intrigued to see that the angle measure canceled out in the process, but it sort of makes sense. Anyone want to verify this?

(Although this question occurred to me after doing a related homework problem, it isn't a homework problem itself, so I hope this is the proper forum for this question.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this section of a cylinder rotating about its center of mass? Is the section shaped sort of like a piece of pie?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top