Do the virtual particles produce a recognizable gravitational force?

Meatbot
Messages
146
Reaction score
1
At any given time, lots of them exist. I would expect this to produce a constant but rapidly changing gravitational force. How is this effect taken into account in cosmological theories?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. I don't clear what you want to do but
2. There are two kind of "virtual" particles in physics concept:
- one is pseudo particles: particles stand for an energy state (vibration states in material, for example)- this kind does not cause a graviational field
- The second kind: virtual prticles which exist in a short time: in principle, this kind will cause gravitation.
Happy new year 2008
 
kttuan said:
1. I don't clear what you want to do but
2. There are two kind of "virtual" particles in physics concept:
- one is pseudo particles: particles stand for an energy state (vibration states in material, for example)- this kind does not cause a graviational field
- The second kind: virtual prticles which exist in a short time: in principle, this kind will cause gravitation.
Happy new year 2008

your first virtual particles are quasiparticles
 
If you are talking about virtual particles as in the type that cause the Casimir effect, I'd assume they do have a gravitational force, but if it is indeed a constant background energy that causes this, the gravitational effect would be pulling from all directions equally, and therefore be 0. It might actually have an effect in the same situations that the Casimir effect applies, but since gravity is many order of magnitude less powerful than the electromagnetic force, it would probably be undetectable.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top