News Do U.S. Pandemic Plans Threaten Civil Rights?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EnumaElish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Civil
AI Thread Summary
U.S. pandemic preparedness strategies are increasingly criticized for adopting a law-enforcement mindset, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU argues that federal plans prioritize a militaristic approach to public health crises over established health measures, raising concerns about civil rights. The report emphasizes that public health policy should focus on protecting citizens rather than viewing health issues through a national security lens. The discussion also touches on the role of FEMA in enforcing civil rights during emergencies, with references to past instances like Hurricane Katrina, where martial law was declared, allowing for the suspension of certain laws. This raises questions about the consistency of the ACLU's stance on civil liberties during public health emergencies.
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Messages
2,346
Reaction score
124
By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor

WASHINGTON (Reuters) Jan 14 - U.S. policy in preparing for a potential bird flu pandemic is veering dangerously toward a heavy-handed law-enforcement approach, the American Civil Liberties Union said on Monday.

The group, which advocates for individuals' legal rights based on the U.S. Constitution, said federal government pandemic plans were confusing and could emphasize a police and military approach to outbreaks of disease, instead of a more sensible public health approach.

"Rather than focusing on well-established measures for protecting the lives and health of Americans, policymakers have recently embraced an approach that views public health policy through the prism of national security and law enforcement," the ACLU report reads.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080114/hl_nm/birdflu_rights_dc_3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't offer any discussion, but the self-evident answer to the question is, of course, yes. FEMA has the power to clamp-down on civil rights.
 
I think the issue is the main thrust of the government's approach. ACLU seems to think it is a militaristic approach.

That's in a way reassuring because the U.S. military may have a comparative advantage over the U.S. civilian machinery (and civilian thinking), and so there may be an efficiency argument to it.
 
No doubt martial law would be declared in the emergency. It is a concept mentioned in the Constitution in connection with the right of Habeas Corpus.

Article 1, Section 9 states, "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

Likewise, the state of Louisiana declared a state of martial law after Katrina or what passed for it (a state of public health emergency) which allowed the governor to suspend laws, order evacuations, and limit the sales of items such as alcohol and firearms. Where was the ACLU then?
 
chemisttree said:
Likewise, the state of Louisiana declared a state of martial law after Katrina or what passed for it (a state of public health emergency) which allowed the governor to suspend laws, order evacuations, and limit the sales of items such as alcohol and firearms. Where was the ACLU then?
Maybe they learn from past experience.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Back
Top